Answer:
Between 1900 and 1945, drastic change occurred from a global view. ... As these large continents battled out their differences, the balance of power from 1900 and 1945 shifted from European domination on all levels to U.S control using liberal and western aspects and communist power in the The Soviet Union.
The American counterculture of the 1960's involved the slogan of love and peace, anti-war, young adults who believed in a utopian-like world where everything was free and the world was completely peaceful. If it could be defined by a single word, it would be the hippies that made up the counterculture.
The answer is C) <span>his lack of religious toleration caused widespread dissatisfaction with the majority of the population
</span>
Unlike his predecessors who were sensitive in ruling a largely Hindu population, Aurangzeb was seen as a more 'religious' leader who wanted to impose some of his own beliefs on his subjects.
However, in reality many historians actually dispute this. While he did destroy some Hindu temples, the number is often exaggerated and it should be noted that he also destroyed mosques.
<span></span>
The correct answer is C.) Lack of diversification in industry, growth was experienced in only a few industries while others suffered.
Explanation:
Option A.) is factually incorrect - there was actually a mass overproduction in the agricultural economy, not “too few farm products.” Farmers actually produced more food than consumers wanted.
Option B.) - Yes, there was indisputably an uneven distribution of wealth; however, it was not in the favor of the farmers. In fact, many farmers were left in sever debt following the agriculture economic crisis.
Option D.) - While there were probably technological advances to a certain degree, it would be incorrect to say there were “too many jobs.” Unemployment rates in the U.S. during the Great Depression reached nearly 25% at its highest (which may not sound drastic, but it absolutely is.) This was one of the highest unemployment rates in history, and it affected most of the industrialized world in the West.
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
