Answer:
The correct answer is - option a. It should be testable in a valid period of time
Explanation:
A thought that presents a temporary clarification about a phenomenon observed by a scientist is a hypothesis. The fundamental highlights of a good scientific hypothesis are: testability and falsifiability
A testable scientific hypothesis should answer the logical question. This is one that can be checked valid or bogus utilizing the information gathered or the experience gained.
a good scientific hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. We should have the option to test the hypothesis utilizing the techniques for science and in the event that you'll review Popper's falsifiability rule, it must be conceivable to accumulate proof that will disconfirm the theory on the off chance that it is surely false.
Thus, the correct answer is - option a. It should be testable in a valid period of time
Based on my observations, the earth rotates from west to east about the axis of rotation. The counter-clockwise rotation of the earth is as viewed from the North Pole star Polaris.
My observations supporting the counter-clockwise rotation of the earth are:
- The Sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
- All celestial objects including the stars and the moon rise in the east and set in the west.
The rotation is the result of the strong geomagnetic field of the earth. It is also responsible for the formation of day and night on the planet.
Learn more about the Rotation of the earth:
brainly.com/question/24246687
Science locates necessary info about how the universe works. Engineering invents practical devices and systems using the knowledge learned by science. Technology is the collection of <span>products of engineering that can be used to solve problems and perform useful </span><span>tasks.</span>
Answer:
a. salivary amylase
Explanation:
salivary amylase breaks down starches (complex carbohydrates) into sugars for the body to absorb more efficiently.
Answer:
you can't.
Explanation:
You can observe evidence there may be a God, but there will always be a counter argument showing that God isn't real. Basically God and biology are ideas both of which may be seen as valid. in other words it depends on who you ask
