1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mojhsa [17]
4 years ago
6

Who were the first white settlers of Australia?

History
1 answer:
Slav-nsk [51]4 years ago
5 0
I think the answer is b
You might be interested in
Who won the Korean War? Give your opinion by checking any boxes that you agree with.
Paladinen [302]

Answer: The United States won because it stopped the spread of communism in South Korea. The Korean Peninsula had the same borders at the end of the war as it did at the beginning.

Explanation:

  • Both statements are factual, and we can take both into account. America and its allies have stopped the advance of communist forces from the north of the Korean peninsula, which were supported by Chinese authorities, and material aid from the Soviet Union. If America and the Allies did not get involved, the Korean peninsula would look like the northern part today. Therefore, the Western powers have stopped the penetration of totalitarianism into the territory of North Korea.
  • On the other hand, the war did not bring about any significant territorial changes. In the war, the domination of both sides was changing. At the end of the war, a "38th parallel" was established, representing the border between the two warring parties (since officially no Korean recognized the end of the conflict).
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is true about Earth's freshwater, air, soil and trees?
timurjin [86]

Answer:

I need the following answers please.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Was the u.s justified in using atomic bombs to end the world war 2?
OleMash [197]
<span>The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu. And it wasn’t necessary either.

</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Critics of firebombs argued that they.
FinnZ [79.3K]
Supporters of the bombings generally believe that they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland, saving more lives than they took by doing so. Opponents contend, among other arguments, that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war or that they constituted a war crime or genocide.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who did the Protestants say was the head of the church?
Ugo [173]
The Pope is the head of the church
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The strong commitment to a political party and a reluctance to acknowledge the opposing party's views is known as
    10·2 answers
  • Vanessa earns a base salary of \$400.00$400.00dollar sign, 400, point, 00 every week with an additional 5\%5%5, percent commissi
    12·2 answers
  • What did The Great Compromise allow the Framers of the Constitution to create?
    12·1 answer
  • If I'm taking an AP test, and instead of taking it on the original day, I take it on the make-up day. Will the questions still b
    7·2 answers
  • In 1899, President McKinley appointed which man as governor over Cuba?
    11·1 answer
  • Cabaran megekalkan keunikan Malaysia
    12·1 answer
  • When was the American Revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • What part did Compromise play in the creation of the Constitution? Was it necessary? Why or Why not? What do you think would hav
    8·1 answer
  • How many amendments comprise the Bill of Rights? twenty-five twelve five ten
    12·2 answers
  • How does Woodrow Wilson relate to WW1 ?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!