Was the u.s justified in using atomic bombs to end the world war 2?

1 answer:

7 0

<span>The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu. And it wasn’t necessary either.

</span>

You might be interested in

How did the glorious revolution get its name?

vovangra [49]

It was one of the first revolutions of its kind to occur non-violently, making it 'glorious'.

5 0

3 years ago

In what way did Constantinople maintain and spread European culture?

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

It spread through the Byzantine conquests in the Balkans and trade routes. War with Turkish tribes also converted them to Orthodox Christianity. ... The Byzantium culture made many important aesthetic contributions to the art of Europe. Byzantium also spread their faith and the Cyrillic alphabet into eastern Europe.

5 0

2 years ago

Besides slavery, what did the 13th amendment ban?

AlekseyPX

Answer:

Involuntary servitude

Explanation:

Involuntary servitude or forced labor ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

8 0

3 years ago

What did the quartering act allow

Nikitich [7]

It allowed British Soldiers to be housed in a colonist's home, the colonist needed to feed and house the British Soldiers (lobster backs).

3 0

3 years ago

Why are pandemics more dangerous to developing nations?

notsponge [240]

Because a pandemic(unlike and epidemic, which is more provincial) reaches around an entire nation and/or continent. Obviously, a nationwide sickness would be terrible for a newly developing nation trying to get on its feet for the first time. It’s just more unnecessary work for the new nation to deal with. Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago