Answer:
Explanation:
The Debate over Ratification Those who supported the Constitution became known as federalists and those who opposed its ratification were called antifederalists. ... The antifederalists favored strong state governments and believed that the national government created by the Constitution was too strong.
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states ...
Because many believed they carried different diseases and they were unequal to whites. They were only peasants and nothing more.
Answer: Abolitionists
Explanation: This law required that fugitive slaves seeking freedom be captured and sent back to their masters as part of a compromise in Congress (this angered Abolitionists, who believed escaped slaves deserved freedom).
He appears to deliver <span>the State of the Union address.
</span>
He was acquitted of all charges by the senate
