Never
Greyhounds will most likely want to run again.
It’s a sentence. Even tho it’s smaller, the sentence makes sense and it doesn’t feel like something is missing. It has all the parts to make a sentence:)
The evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
According to the excerpt, the narrator talks about plants and hamsters and their similarities and differences. He deceptively compares them by saying that a hamster requires attention from its owner, usually by talking, but plants cando fine without needing anybody to talk to them.
Faulty analogy is a type of fallacy that makes use of deceptive comparisons to attempt to prove a point.
Therefore, the evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/4025909
Answer:
I would describe it in as much detail as I could, tell them the concept, and the category it belongs to.
Explanation:
They're your friend, so you'd want them to know everything about it and why you like it, right? They could end up taking interest in it and start playing it with you.
