1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
Between the years 2009 and 2013, the primary factor that caused collisions in california was _____.
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

Driving at unsafe speeds

Explanation:

Between the years 2009 and 2013, the primary factor that caused collisions in California was driving at unsafe speeds. The number of accidents reported was at peak due to a majority of the drivers over-speeding.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In passing this office to the Vice President, I also do so with the profound sense of the weight of responsibility that will fal
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

healing the divisions in the country

Explanation:

Option B is what President Nixon suggest is the first challenge facing the new president.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened at ft mchenry 1814?
Tomtit [17]
Star Spangled Banner. Flag that flew over Fort McHenry<span> during its bombardment in </span>1814.
8 0
3 years ago
Who did great britain fight against in the war of the spanish succession (1702–1713)?
Georgia [21]
France and Spain I hope this helps could I please get a brainliest
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do a traditional economy, a market economy,<br> a command economy, and a mixed economy differ?
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

Traditional economy relies on habit, custom, or ritual to decide what to produce, how to produce it, and to whom to distribute it.

A market economy, economic decisions are made by individuals and are based on exchange, or trade.

A command economies, because a central authority is in command of the economy.

Mixed economies market-based economic systems in which government plays a limited role.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did race affect imperialism in Africa
    9·1 answer
  • In essence, _____ was a call for the post-war South to take on the more industrial aspects that were seen as beneficial for the
    6·2 answers
  • How does due process limit eminent domain?
    11·1 answer
  • Which state is likely to be larger, Massachusetts or Idaho? Why?
    14·2 answers
  • In what way did the 1862 homestead act help pull immigrants to the united states
    8·2 answers
  • List some of the occupations open to women by the war
    14·2 answers
  • Please help only if you plan on answering ALL four questions <br> please and thank u
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement would most likely be made by someone against Manifest<br> Destiny?
    5·2 answers
  • Which individual (choose one: Samuel Morse, John Deere, Cyrus McCormick) do you think created the invention with the greatest im
    7·1 answer
  • Who started the assembly line method of production?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!