1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
I need help with this history diagram
Schach [20]

Answer:

New England colonies: 4, 3, 11

Middle Colonies: 6, 10, 9, 7, 8

Southern colonies: 5, 2, 1

All: 12

Explanation:

(I'm not too sure about what their shared characteristics are based on the answer choices given but I hope this helps :DD)

7 0
2 years ago
What is the bank compared to and why grapes of wrath?
jarptica [38.1K]
The bank monsters and grape of wrath is 75years
6 0
3 years ago
Who were the people who helped open the west?
Sliva [168]
They're Were Several People
<span>The Explorers
</span>The Mountain Men
The Californios
The Missionaries
The Pioneer Women
The Mormons
The Forty-Niners
The Chinese
5 0
3 years ago
Use the following words in a sentence about the development of political parties. a. partisan b. caucus
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The formation and development of political parties are usually a result of the decision of a group of people often referred to as CAUCUS who come together to form a political party.

This group of people or CAUCUS shares similar ideas or causes in which they are considered to favor greatly or ardent PARTISANs of such principles or political belief.

6 0
3 years ago
1. Prior to the annexation of Hawaii, what were Americans' chief concerns?
slamgirl [31]

Many things happened before Hawaii's Annexation.

Gold Rush, Presidential election of William Mckinley, economic depression, and the World's Fair.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the three most important inventions created during the Neolithic revolution ( the agricultural revolution) ?
    9·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!! Which sentence best explains how the slave trade affected American Indians?
    13·1 answer
  • What effect did imperial legislation in england of the late 1600s have on the chesapeake colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • Why would a historican use a primary source when study a historical event?
    13·1 answer
  • Unfair taxation was a cause in which revolutions?
    8·1 answer
  • Why were absolute monarchies more common Eastern Europe than in Western Europe?
    9·2 answers
  • What challenges did the Continental Army face at Valley Forge
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following tactics was not used by Alexander the Great to maintain control over his empire? A. gain loyalty form loc
    8·2 answers
  • C
    10·2 answers
  • Match the country with the correct description of a practice used toward slaves.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!