1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
Which three groups were imprisoned in internment camps during World War II?
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

<h3><u>Japanese Americans </u></h3>

Explanation:

<h2>Hope this helps!! </h2>
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A well-written description of one international event or issue that was discussed or reported by the media after 2013. Remember
goldfiish [28.3K]
Did the question come with any answer choices
3 0
3 years ago
What conclusions can be drawn about Native Americans journey to the reservation
Ann [662]
<span>Some Native Americans traveled by boat at least part of the way.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why is Carl Sanders important in the county unit system events?
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

C I think

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HLEP MEEE PLEASE CHILD HILD ME GOD HLESS UUU
miss Akunina [59]
25. a
26. True
27. True
28. False
29. True
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the central features of the "middle colonies"? Explain how they differed from New England and the southern colonies.
    9·1 answer
  • imagine you are a historian studying a journal written by a citizen living in east berlin when the Berlin Wall was being constru
    13·1 answer
  • A group of people and territories that are ruled over by a powerful leader is referred to as a(n)
    5·2 answers
  • In the feminine mystique the author argued that
    6·2 answers
  • Help me please? i dont understand where to put the partheese to get 32
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these gives the main purpose of the passage?
    15·2 answers
  • Can anyone help me!!a
    7·2 answers
  • Who know this question.​
    5·1 answer
  • Citizenship 06 Template &amp; Rubric
    7·2 answers
  • Please help<br><br> Which letter correctly identifies Japan?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!