1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
How did the Munich Agreement affect Germany’s actions in the Czech region of the Sudetenland?
Naddik [55]

Answer:

In the Munich Agreement the U.K and France handed over the region.

Explanation:

It officially handed over this region to germany to appease them and a feeble attempt to prevent war.

3 0
4 years ago
Term for receiving land, ten letter word.
disa [49]

Answer:

hmmm check my explanation

Explanation:

the word is "inheritance" :)

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best states Alexander Hamilton’s attitude toward the conflict between Great Britain and France?
zubka84 [21]
The answer that best states Alexander Hamilton's attitude toward the conflict between Great Britain and France is that C. he favored the British.
He wanted Britain to become the closest ally to the United States.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the underground railroad an eample of?
Alja [10]
A way for fugitive slaves to escape to Canada.
4 0
3 years ago
Write a paragraph describing how global exploration impacted indigenous peoples around the world. Include specific examples of i
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

European conquest and colonization had deeply disturbing, devastating effects on Indian peoples of America, of the New World. Under Spanish rule, for example, they were enslaved and forced to work for Spanish landlords; their cultures and languages were destroyed and erased; their original beliefs disappeared, censored and condemned as idolatry, paganism and witchcraft; new diseases decimated them.  So, the coming of the Europeans was not a happy event for Indians.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the battle of bunker hill considered a patriot victory
    6·1 answer
  • What conditions fostered the rise of absolute monarchs in Europe?
    14·2 answers
  • What did some businesses do to make sure the government did not get involved with their industries?
    5·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson opposed Alexander Hamilton’s plan to create a national bank primarily because the plan would 1. weaken the nati
    10·2 answers
  • Target due: 12/3/20 All changes saved 17. Which earlier war got Great Britain into large amounts of debt that led to taxing the
    11·1 answer
  • What is a American Bully Dog? i am doing a paper and this is the assighnment
    15·1 answer
  • 4. ¿Qué significa la palabra neutralidad? <br>​
    6·1 answer
  • .Answer for brainilest and 10 points
    7·2 answers
  • What should ALL citizens expect from their government?
    10·1 answer
  • Who was Chief Justice for more than 30 years? *
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!