1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
Angered by the___colonists believed they should be taxed only bytheir own assemblies
Reil [10]

The answer is:

Stamp Act.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does a country gross domestic product measure
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

Essentially, it measures the economic performance of a country. It's a measure of the final market value of goods and services for a country during a specific time.

5 0
2 years ago
In the American colonies which document called for religious freedom
BARSIC [14]
I believe that is the Mayflower Compact
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true about the House of Burgesses? It included women, enslaved persons, and indentured servants. It wa
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

It allowed a degree of self-rule.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects citizens from the deprivation of property without the due process of law
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A major obstacle to developing good human relations skills is that
    14·2 answers
  • Why were west african leaders eager to engage in trade with europeans
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true about the American economy of the 1920s 5 points Most Americans worked in the farming
    7·1 answer
  • Who is best known for her leadership of the women’s suffrage movement
    10·1 answer
  • In what ways did Georgia's culture change as a result of reconstruction? (Chose all that apply)
    12·1 answer
  • Explain what life was like in Western Europe prior to the Crusades socially
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Missouri Compromise attempt to solve the debate over expanding slavery into new territories?
    13·1 answer
  • Which factor played the most important role in the rise of totalitarianism in
    11·1 answer
  • Please help fast i will give brainliest
    12·1 answer
  • What can you conclude about the most precious metal?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!