1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
First established in 1787, what set unitarians apart from other christian denominations?
Dafna1 [17]
<span>Unitarians were set apart from other Christian denominations because Unitarians have a believe that God is composed of only one entity. Most other Christian denominations believe that God is a trinity that is composed of the father, son, and the holy spirit.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
HURRY PLEASE I NEED HELP!!!!!!!
Pie
Egyptians i think. ????
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Derrick is 13 5 6 years old. Nancy is 1 1 3 years older than Derrick and Jane is 1 1 4 years older than Nancy. How old is Jane?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

1583

Explanation:

1356 +113=1496

1495+114=1583

I

6 0
3 years ago
How do historians define the term historical context
yulyashka [42]
It’s defined by historical context igggggg
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did European exploration continue even after the accomplishment of Vasco da Gama?
FrozenT [24]
To find a faster route to Asia
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • After Lincoln won the 1860 presidential election, this event happened next
    13·1 answer
  • Read this quote, then answer the question: "An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind." You can tell by the me
    7·2 answers
  • Conservatives who opposed the New Deal did so for three main reasons. What were they?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between an enclave and an exclave.
    14·2 answers
  • 7. Leader often shares power with other parts of government
    7·1 answer
  • How did the war against Mexico help the United States achieve its manifest destiny?
    13·1 answer
  • 7. What was needed for successful bartering between settlements?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Booker T. Washington establish Tuskegee University? A.Washington believed that African Americans needed to challenge the
    8·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS!!! Was the Compromise of 1850 any better than the Missouri Compromise or the Nullification Crisis at fixing the proble
    15·1 answer
  • How does hunting affect the web of life?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!