1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
11

Help fast!!!

History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Arguments against:

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for:

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

kifflom [539]3 years ago
4 0

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

You might be interested in
When it was created the fourthteen amendment to the constitution ensured rights for
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

Hope this help :)

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed

7 0
3 years ago
How many black Americans enlisted to fight in the civil war
svlad2 [7]
179000 -》United States Army
19000-》Navy

total amount is 198000 Black Americans
Hope it helps!
#MissionExam001
7 0
3 years ago
Do forces give every object its shape
lora16 [44]
Every Natural object
7 0
3 years ago
In the period circa 1750 to 1900, revolutions occurred in many parts of the world.
Kitty [74]

Answer:

In the period 1750 - 1900, there were many revolutions around the world, that changed the global social, economic, and political landscape. Many of these revolutions had one thing in common: they were led by people who demanded the end of monarchies or dictatorships, and the establishment of more republicans forms of government.

We had three good examples to confirm this: the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the Latin American Revolutions. They all occurred from the end of the XVIII century to the first three decades of the XIX century. They all wanted to end a monarchical form of government, and to replace it with a Republican form of government.

The American Revolution is the clearest example, it resulted in the secession of the American Colonies from the United Kingdom, and the formation of a new federal republic: the United States of America.

6 0
3 years ago
1. Name 4 ways the United States tried to help the war in Europe without actually going to war.
Talja [164]
1, 2, 3 and and the second 2. I hope I could help. Have a wonderful rest of the day.
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a direct democracy?
    13·1 answer
  • Mark each statement if it reflects Sumerian religious beliefs.
    6·2 answers
  • Cultural regions can be very diverse due to which of the following reasons?
    9·2 answers
  • One reason Hitler came to a power was the poor economic conditions in Germany Fact or opinion
    6·1 answer
  • Explain the meaning of the meme
    6·2 answers
  • How would the Enlightenment movement have suffered if the Scientific Revolution had not occurred?
    13·2 answers
  • Which is the best definition of figurative language?
    9·2 answers
  • A native, caribbean culture existed in Puerto Rico before the arrival of Columbus.
    12·1 answer
  • A person who believes in isolationism thinks that​
    7·2 answers
  • Why did hitler not increase arms production early in the war?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!