Answer:
its not being addressed thats the problem
Explanation:
A few weeks back, I’ve almost ran into an accident. In the following I will tell you what exactly happened and how my friend saved my life.
I was waiting for the train at the train station with my good old friend by my side.
About 30 minutes later, the train finally arrived at the train station. However, we were on the other side of the station. We both ran as fast as we could to the other side. I was in such a hurry that I didn’t realize how close I was to the rails... and then it happened. I slipped in between the gap of the train and the platform with my right leg. I thought I was going to die...
My friend grabbed me below my arms and got me out just in time.
Answer:
Matt and Marissa Bishop
Marissa’s father, Glen
Glen’s former sister-in-law in Door County, Wis.
Marissa’s mother, Caroline
Explanation:
Matt is an orphan
In this first novel
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
