Answer:
The correct answer is A)
The Mosque of Selim II demonstrates the Sultan's ability to approve the interior organisation of a religious space.
Explanation:
The mosques' placement was compared by Gülru Necipoğlu, a leading Ottoman art historian, to that of a church’s altar. She stated that while the innovation on the interior disrupts the space below the dome, it indicated the Chief Architects' interest in outdoing Christian architecture.
The chief architect - Koca Mi'mâr Sinân Âğâ and also engineer provided his services to the Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, Selim II, and Murad III.
Of course, it is reasonable to expect that such a huge historically significant project will not take off without the express ratification of the Selim.
Cheers!
Answer:
freedom of speech, press, assembly, petitioning and religion
Explanation:
For example a group of protestors are protesting a new law which endangers a local animal habitat with many animals living in it. They can protest this law under the 1st amendment which ensures freedom of assembly and freedom of speech.
<u>Mixed Economy:</u>
The mixed economy in economics cohabits with the government's intervention in the market systems of allocating resources, trade, and commerce.
When a government gets involved to undermine free markets through the establishment of state-owned companies (such as public healthcare or education), legislation, incentives, tariffs, and taxation policies, it may create a mixed economy.
It is structured among true capitalism and true socialism, with a certain number of free-market components and social democratic elements. It is the combination of the aspects of capitalism and socialism.
Mixed economies generally preserve private control and ownership over most production processes but often regulated by the state. These type of economies are socializing industries which are considered essential.
Even if some economists question the economic consequences of different mixed modes of economics, they are all common in historical and contemporary economies.
Answer:
The cause of the Intolerable Acts was King George was furious about the Boston Tea Party and closed the harbor and took away their self government until all the tea was paid for. ... The cause of the Boston Tea Party was the colonists didn't want taxed tea.
Answer:
Britain had an elite society that welcomed industrialization while Russia did not.
Explanation:
British elites were open to the idea of investing into railways and factories. Politically, the British also had a parliament that allowed some form of representation in the government. There was also no more serfdom at the time of industrialization in the early 1800s. On the other hand, Russian elites were very opposed to investing or industrialization as this could threaten their wealth that they already accumulated. Serfdom was still legal in Russia until March 3 1861 when Alexander II abolished it, which meant that many peasants were tied to the land and could not migrate to urban areas. Furthermore, Russia was fully autocratic unlike Britian and only saw the implementation of a parliament in 1905. All of this meant that Britain's industrialization was very quick and significantly earlier than Russia's.
