Even though Louis had absolute power, was he doing the best he could with it? Why or why not? Provide evidence.

History

1 answer:

Mrac [35]2 years ago

8 0

Explanation:

No, he wasn't. Louis had a lot of power but he never used it for any good. He wanted to become a good leader and king, however, he was more devoted to his carpentry. Louis spent a lot of money on his wife and his own pleasures when there was absolutley no need. While the third estate was begging for more money, fewer taxes, and a good life, he was half ignoring them and tending to his own needs instead, when he could have been helping and taking care of his citizens as a good king should.

You might be interested in

Which nation is an example of a government in which the president and prime minister are both active participants in the day-to-

denis23 [38]

Nigeria is an example of such nation.

6 0

3 years ago

Which type of interaction defines other groups as morally or intellectually inferior? Defensive othering Oppressive othering Tra

hjlf

It would be "Oppressive othering" that most <span>defines other groups as morally or intellectually inferior, since in this case the word "oppressive" implies that one group is being subjected to the will of another. </span>

7 0

3 years ago

What was the purpose of the Coercive Acts?

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

The Coercive acts was a act that had 5 laws. The British government had a purpose of restoring authority in its colony. It also lead to the start of the Boston tea party

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is one difference between the Texas Bill of Rights and the United States Bill of Rights?

sasho [114]

Explanation:

Equality under the law shall not be denied or abridged because of sex,race, color, creed, or national origin. This amendment is self-operative.

Answer:

According to the explanation, the answer it's C!