Rilke writes about a swan, but the swan could symbolize humankind.
This is because the complete poem by Rilke talks about the swan and how clumsy it could be while walking and also, Rilke compares MAN with the clumsy swan in life as shown in the line “which is letting go/ of the ground we stand on and cling to every day”
<h3>What is Symbolism?</h3>
This refers to the use of words to mean another thing and could be compared to another thing or person to give it a deeper meaning.
Hence, we can see that from the complete poem, there is the narration of the life of swans and how clumsy they could be.
Therefore, we can see that Rilke compares MAN with the clumsy swan in life as shown in the line “which is letting go/ of the ground we stand on and cling to every day”
Read more about symbolism here:
brainly.com/question/2712146
#SPJ1
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided some context to the text.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The text is an excerpt from the story, <em>"Julius Caesar" </em>by William Shakespeare. We find an ongoing dialogue by the character, Anthony with Caesar. In this dialogue, Antony inquires of Caesar if he intends to expand his achievements as a conqueror; who he intends to plot against next.
Iambic pentameter. hope that helps
Who would be correct if you read the sentence and fill in the blank
Answer:
1: Non-verbal communication is very ambiguous. Number of gestures and facial expression is very limited as compared to words and phrases.
2: Nonverbal communications differs from culture to culture.
3: There people and channels involved in communication are complex as well as compound (more in number). The environment (dining and business) makes the non-verbal communication complex
Explanation:
1: The limitation of non-verbal communication because of few gestures and expressions makes it very difficult to properly understand it. Non-verbal communication is just complementary to verbal communication. When stand alone, it cannot offer complete meaning.
2: In this situation, the people involved belong to different cultures, and different background (waitress). Because of this reason there is a clear chance of misunderstanding between people.
3: The situation is also complex because of the setting and context. There might have been some cultural etiquette of eating which Americans were not following. May be loud speaking before eating was what made the Japanese uncomfortable. May be it was frank communication between employees of different designations of the company. These factors make the situation complex. Moreover this non-verbal communication is taking place between people of three different groups/backgrounds i.e. business people from Japan, business people from America, and waitress. This situation adds more the misunderstanding between people in this scenario.
