Answer: $196,800
Explanation:
The cash payments to suppliers for inventory purchases will be:
= Cost of goods sold - Decrease in inventory - Increase in accounts payable
Decrease in inventory = 23,500 - 17,800
= $5,700
Increase in accounts payable
= 13,500 - 6,000
= $7,500
Cash to suppliers for inventory = 210,000 - 5,700 - 7,500
= $196,800
Answer: No
Explanation: D/E is a solvency ratio. Liquidity ratios are quick and current ratios.
No, 401(k) can not be considered as an individual retirement account.
The 401(k) differs from an individual retirement account ((RA) because A 401(k) is created through an individual's employer. Generally, 401(k)s as well as individual retirement accounts include beneficial tax advantages, But where we see a distinction is that the 401(k)s are designed for employers of labor to offer while individual retirement accounts are for Individuals as IRAS give more investment opportunities and 401(k)s gives a higher annual contribution.
To know more about Individual retirement account visit:
brainly.com/question/2084315
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": existence, completeness, and rights and obligations.
Explanation:
Assertions are management claims about certain matters regarding a company. Those claims are raised as a result of <em>auditing</em> the firm's financial statements. There are three (3) types of assertions which are:
- Transaction-level assertions: <em>accuracy, classification, completeness, cutoff, and occurrence.
</em>
- Account balance assertions: <em>completeness, existence, rights and obligations, and valuation.
</em>
- Presentation and disclosure assertions: <em>accuracy, completeness, occurrence, rights and obligations, and understandability.</em>
Answer:
The correct to answer to the following question is option A) Tacit collusion .
Explanation:
Tacit collusion ( which is also know as price leadership ) can be defined as the situation where a dominant firm in the market will set a price and other firms in the market would accept those changes in the price. Here the dominant firm usually sets high price, such that the firms who are least cost efficient would also be able to earn some return.
