Answer:
Interceptors, Inc.
Cash flow from financing in 2018:
$71
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
2015 2016 2017 2018
Cash $ 54 $ 78 $ 102 $ 126
Cash from operations $ 146 $ 144 $ 141 $ 136
Net capital spending $ 178 $ 173 $ 178 $ 183
Cash from financing $ 56 $ 53 $ 61
2015 2016 2017 2018
Cash at the beginning $30 $54 $78 $102
Cash from operations $ 146 $ 144 $ 141 $ 136
Cash from financing $ 56 $ 53 $ 61 $ 71
Net capital spending ($ 178) ($ 173) ($ 178) ($ 183)
Cash $ 54 $ 78 $ 102 $ 126
Cash from the beginning for 2015 = (Cash at the end plus net capital spending) minus (Cash from operations plus cash from financing)
= /$30 ($54 + $178) - ($146 + $56)
Cash from financing in 2018 = (Cash at the end plus net capital spending) minus (Cash from operations plus cash at the beginning)
= $71 ($126 + $183) - ($136 + $102)
Answer:
Assuming the same rate that Coca Cola's did in Germany between 1939 and 2008 and the same volume distribution of 2011 cases sales, then hypothetically sales in Germany in 2053 would be 226 bilion cases.
Explanation:
Taking the Coca Cola's worldwide growth the same rate that Coca Cola's grew in Germany between 1939 and 2008, that is 10.26% per, then for the 26.7 billion from today up to the 2053 year we would have:
S = 26.7 billion * (1.1026)^42 = 1614 billion cases
If we use volume distribution of the year 2011, then sales in Germany would be:
SG = 1614 billion cases * 14 % = 226 billion cases
Answer:
<u>Unethical work behavior</u>
Explanation:
It is very unfortunate in many organization for such kind of scenarios to occur which could lead to dismissal from work if the gets to know about the attitude.
Remembering that no one will be pleased totally in workplace you will have to give people the benefit of the doubt by trusting them because If we all run around mistrusting others, we end up creating a miserably unhappy business culture.
Answer:
Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Explanation:
The unit profit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit - Fixed cost per unit
Unit Profit of product A = $21 - $11 - $5 = $5
Unit Profit of product B = $12 - $7 - $3 = $2
Unit Profit of product C = $32 - $18 - $9 = $5
The profit of each product in 1 machine hour = 1 hour/ Machine hours per unit * Unit Profit
Profit of Product A in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2 * $5 = $25
Profit of Product B in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.5*$2 = $4
Profit of Product C in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2* $5 = $25
Product A & Product C have same profit in 1 hour machine, then we have to consider Direct labor hours per unit which product A is 0.4 while product C is 0.7. It means Product C is more costly in direct labour than Product A.
In short, then the ranking of the products from the most profitable to the least profitable use of the constrained resource is Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Answer:
c. employment levels will decrease
Explanation:
As interest rates move up, the cost of borrowing becomes more expensive. This means that demand for lower-yield bonds will drop, causing their price to drop.
