Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
The appropriate response is staffing pattern. The staffing administration design gives the organized procedures to recognize persistent needs and afterward to convey the staff assets as productively and viable as could be expected under the circumstances. A viable arrangement initially concentrates on balancing out the unit center staffing. A staffing example, or center scope, is resolved through a gauge workload and a prescribed care standard.
<span>AS THE HYPE FOR THE SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GETS ELECTRIFYING, THERE HAVE BEEN QUESTIONS RAISED ABOUT CARRIE UNDERWOOD'S PAYMENT FOR HER PERFORMANCE DURING THE INAUGURATION OF THE SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL. RIGHT NOW HER PAYCHECK HASN'T BEEN LISTED ONLINE. BUT ACCORDING TO PayWizard.Org HER DAILY PAY WOULD BE AROUND $21,917.00. RIGHT NOW THE AMERICAN SINGER HAS A NET WORTH OF ABOUT $55 MILLION.</span>
Answer:
And he has reasons to be angry. The hotels usually are part of a large chain that can provide service for costumers to be happy in the given case that something like what you described happens. The hotel is not taking into account the interest and concerns of it's costumer and that will greatly affect the reputation the have.
Explanation:
When a company "Guarantee" a service or product is under the moral obligation to satisfy the costumer on the terms previously agreed on. Managers should be aware that failing to fix the problem will no doubt affect the perception of possible clients in the future.
Answer:
Letter B is correct. <u>Narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</u>
Explanation:
Case study is an investigative methodological approach applied to simple or applied social sciences. It is carried out through the use of different qualitative methods for the collection of data and information relevant to the foundation of the research. The qualitative method is the most appropriate in a case study, as it occurs through subjective and not substantially statistical means of in-depth analysis of relevant factors in an event, an individual, an institution, a group and others.
Case studies can be classified as:
- exploratory,
- descriptive, or
- explanatory.
So it is correct to state that the purpose of the case study is to reduce the difference between theory and practice. Because the analysis of the information collected and the variables and patterns found will provide subsidies for the discussion and better understanding and reasoning between what happens between the theory and the practice analyzed in the case study.
