Answer:
Hunter-gatherers would lead a more spontaneous life, so they would hunt and gather whatever they can. In a way, their life would also be more regular by not being seasonal.
The settlers would have to plan a lot, on a long term and their life would be very closely connected to seasons: they would likely develop culture surrounding seasonal festivities.
Explanation:
<em>Some see immigration as a negative phenomenon, as it affects economy, jobs and rights of native people. While other see immigration as a good thing because it can bring new consumers, new culture, new knowledge. It is always possible to point out advantages and disadvantages.</em>
<em>Immigration is a natural human phenomenon, but modern societies with civil rights evolutions are addressing it differently than earlier as now there is so much more control over borders and passages of humans from one place to another.</em>
<em>The positive side it can help grow the economy, regulate and increase low birth rate or problems with elderly populations, fill up jobs or positions that are out of the market in certain place (example: for lower and heavy jobs or either high skilled as nurses or doctors). The negative side is if there is no job for the immigrants or houses enough they will be homeless and will need support from the government, this can affect negative all the social structure, bringing health issues, increase of violence and many other issues.</em>
<em />
Both cultures faced anti capitalist views while over throwing the monarchy of Britain and of Frances king
they both wanted democracy and sought for change for the freedom of people, free market which created the mix economy agenda
Answer is B. representative democracy
Based on the options given, the answer is a. leave them alone. Laissez-faire means leaving the people on the task and letting them perform on their own. Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
