In assessing the internal validity of an intervention, we try to determine if certain changes cause certain outcomes. It is relevant in studies that try to establish casual relationship. While in observational or descriptive studies, it is not that relevant. It is also possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct validity. Example, imagine a study where you are looking at the effects of a new computerized tutoring program on math performance in first grade students.
1. Taxes are used to pay for people who work for the government.
2.Tax is a portion taken out of weekly paychecks and sent to the government.
Answer:
since your item is a mango
Explanation:
people who worked to produce them :
1. farmer
2. factory
3. advertisers
4. markets
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
"United States v O'Brein, United States v. Eichman, Korematsu v. United States, Abrams et al. v. United States"
Answer:
Korematsu v. United States
Explanation:
The opinion shown above was issued in the Korematsu v. United States.
Korematsu v. United States was a case related to defending the petition that excluded Japanese-American citizens from the military area of the west coast during the Second World War. This occurred after the attack on Pearl Habor organized by American troops, causing a great loss to the USA and leaving the Japanese and descendants as unwanted people and enemies of the USA.
As a result, the government ordered all Japanese and Japanese descendants to leave their homes and move into internment camps (similar to concentration camps), which were places with no structure and resources necessary for the survival of these people. Because of this inhospitable environment Fred Korematsu, a descendant of Japanese, refused to go to the internment camps and claimed that this was a violation of the Fifth Amendment, that is, it was illegal. Thus began the case Korematsu v. United States.
Answer:
Epics
Explanation:
An epic is a long narrative poem about a heroic figure.
