Answer:
Latifundista: peligro por la perdida de tierra; campesino: mayores oportunidades de crecimiento.
Explanation:
Las reformas sociales de Eloy Alfaro buscaban favorecer el trabajo de los campesinos teniendo en cuenta los abusos que cometian los hacendados y que los perejudicaba muy fuertemente, y es la situacion en donde por las grandes extensiones de tierra tienen la capacidad de cultivar una cantidad considerable de productos que luego son vendidos en el mercado y se genera un acaparamiento que no permite que los campesinos vendan sus mercancias a un precio justo.
En esta situacion los latifundistas pudieron experimentar un miedo representado en las politivas de Alfaro, debido a que consideraron que podian perder sus tierras por el apoyo que tenia esta iniciativa en los campesinos. Estos ultimos seguramente se sintieron seguros de que por fin iban a tener la posibilidad de vender sus productos en el mercado y que las tierras no utilizadas por los latifundistas podrian usarlas para incrementar su produccion.
To Mother and Father,
I didn't do it. You guys know that too. I so stressed and tired, and I wish I could just go back home and everything be ok. I have no idea where this "evidence" is coming from and I'm getting stressed thinking about that too. I'm trying to keep it together but it's hard to especially when I could go to jail for something I didn't do. I miss you all so much.
Your child,
your-name-here
The correct answer is A positive correlation
Explanation: A positive correlation indicates that the two variables move together, and the relationship is strong the closer the correlation gets to one. A negative correlation indicates that the two variables move in opposite directions, and that the relationship also becomes stronger the closer to minus 1 the correlation becomes.
Producers won't always be able to sell their products at higher prices, because of quantity-demanded. ... Consumers will always want to buy more products for less money, but producers will always want to sell more products for more money.
Answer:
The new deal were a number of different reforms that were conducted under President Roosevelt between 1933-1939. The programs just ended before World War II began and were designed to help recover from the great Depression of the late 1920s.
Like any government reforms, there were both supporters and a vocal opposition.
Explanation:
<em>Argument 1 in favour:</em> The Great Depression had the greatest impact on the working class and the poor. Radical programs were needed to ensure the economy can grow, more jobs can be created and basic social needs met.
<em>Argument 2 in favour: </em>It is the responsibility of the government to ensure the poorest in the society do not suffer. Thanks to the reforms, the American economy rebounded and when the second war started,America was probably the most industrialised country in the world.
<em>Argument 1 against:</em> The American economy is built on the foundations of capitalism, free market and minimum government intervention. The reforms might seem good for now, but they are changing the way American government works and in subsequent years, companies will always look to the government for a bailout.
<em>Argument 2 against: </em>We cannot trust the government to make rational decisions. Such reforms are similar to the ones seen in Soviet Union and can lead to mismanagement of epic proportions.