Answer:
1. Must Gidgits Galore provide its employees with benefits? No
2. Does Gidgits Galore have to implement a payroll tax for unemployment, workers' compensation, or Social Security? Yes
3. Gidgits Galore is concerned about hiring employees from other countries whose language skills may not be proficient and is considering hiring only native English speakers. Is this a good idea? No
4. Does the Commerce Clause have an effect on Gidgits Galore? Yes
5. Can Gidgits Galore face any repercussions if it disregards Title VII? Yes
6. Gidgits Galore is concerned about hiring employees from other countries whose language skills may not be proficient and is considering hiring only native English speakers. Would this represent "disparate treatment"? Yes
7. Gidgits Galore wants a "young and hip" workforce. Is there a problem if it chooses not to hire anyone over the age of forty? Yes
8. Gidgits Galore wants to put a section in its updated employment manual preventing employees from taking more than thirty days from work without pay, regardless of the reason. Is this a good idea? No
9. What if Gidgits Galore wants to add a provision to its employee manual preventing employees from forming a union? Can this be done? No
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Answer: a) increase in the demand for Kindles.
Explanation: the substitution effect for substitute goods gives that, if the price of good A rises, the demand for good B rises. Since a substitute good is a good that can be used in place of another, they are goods that a consumer perceives as similar or are comparable, in such a way that having more of one good causes the consumer to desire less of the other good. From the viewpoint of price, and given that consumers always prefer to spend less in instances where two goods are substitutes, it then means that Kindle can be used and preferred in place of Nooks given that the price of Nooks had gone up. Therefore, increasing the price of Nooks causes a corresponding increase in the demand for Kindles.
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
Answer:
1) this country's public debt = $42 billion
2) incomplete question
Explanation:
A budget deficit is the difference between a country's income and its expenditures, a deficit occurs when expenditures are larger than revenues. The public debt would be the accumulation of all the country's budget deficits or surpluses.
public debt = -$20 - $30 + $10 - $2 = -$42 billion
