Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C (Animism).
Explanation:
- Animism would be the conviction that certain artifacts, locations, and living beings have a distinguishable spiritual actuality.
- It wants to portray all stuff includes animals, plants, rocks, ponds, weather patterns, individual handicrafts and probably sometimes words as alive.
Therefore, given is the concept of Animism.
The answer should be Police and the court if I am not wrong.
Answer:
I believe the correct answer is Investigative interest.
Explanation:
John Holland is a psychologist who propounded a theory that classified thinkers and their various career interests. According to him, investigative interest involves an individual who is a rational thinker with a huge interest in research work and theory. Such an individual is always inquisitive and open to finding and understanding new theories. In my opinion, having an investigative interest make you think logically, you analyse issues and try to solve them. Examples of careers that involve investigative interests are Writers, Aerospace Engineer, Pharmacist, electrical engineer, etc.
Given the above, Austin's intention to one day become an engineer to solve issues in the world of science indicates an investigative interest.
conditioned stimulus
In classical conditioning<span>, a conditioned stimulus is one which is previously a neutral stimulus, which, upon becoming associated with an unconditioned stimulus, eventually triggers a conditioned response.
</span>
An unconditioned stimulus is one which <span>unconditionally, naturally, and automatically elicits or triggers a(n) (unconditioned) response. For example, the smell of food usually triggers hunger.
In contrast, a conditioned stimulus is one which initially does not trigger the same response as the unconditioned stimulus, but because of association, eventually triggers the same response as well. The response to a conditioned stimulus is a conditioned response.
For example, in the famous experiment by Ivan Pavlov, the sound of a bell was paired with the serving of food to dogs. Dogs naturally salivate upon smelling/seeing the food. However, later on, even without the food, when the dogs heard the sound of the bell, they began salivating. The sound of the bell is the conditioned stimulus, while the salivation of the dog in response to the conditioned stimulus, the bell, is called a conditioned response. </span>
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
