Answer:
a deposition
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that what is being described in this scenario is known as a deposition. Like mentioned in the question this is a witness's sworn out-of-court testimony, in which the individual in question or deponent (Fones’s chief executive officer (CEO)) is placed under oath and asked a set of questions which are gathered as part of the discovery process, and may or may not be used at the trial.
Answer:
c. small punishments; large punishments
Explanation:
If you want someone to do something just once, you should use small punishments; but if you want someone to develop a deep-seated attitude that lasts, you should use large punishments.
Answer:
B. States can use double jeopardy
Explanation:
What is important here in this case is the ruling. This case is one that is concerned with the double Jeopardy clause. Benton ruled here that this clause, which is a fifth amendment clause is applicable to the States. the major aim of this class is to offer protection to a defendant against a second prosecution or trial for the same offence that they have been convicted of.
The <em>person </em>who Maria should contact to find out if she is allowed to use the nickname is:
- <u>The original author of the popular book series</u>
According to the given question, we are asked to show the person who Maria would contact if she would make use of a nickname from a popular book series and also using similar personality features.
As a result of this, we can see that if Maria goes ahead to make use of this nickname, she could be sued for intellectual theft because she is not only <em>using the same nickname</em>, but also same personality traits.
With this in mind, Maria should contact the owner of the popular book series to <em>get her consent</em> to make use of the nickname.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/20901151