Answer:
Explanation:
1. Accounts Receivable - Asset (Come under Current Asset)
2. Equipment - Asset (Come under Fixed asset)
3. Fees Earned - Revenue (Come under income statement)
4. Insurance Expense - Expense (Come under income statement)
5. Prepaid Advertising - Assets (Come under Current Asset)
6. Prepaid Rent - Asset (Come under Current Asset)
7. Rent Revenue - Revenue (Come under income statement)
8. Salary Expense - Expense (Come under income statement)
9. Salary Payable - Liability (Come under current liabilities)
10. Supplies - Asset (Come under Current Asset)
11. Supplies Expense - Expense (Come under income statement)
12. Unearned Rent - Liability (Come under current liabilities)
Answer:
Explanation:
It means that there must be a huge number of people that have little or nothing.
The most recent estimate of America's population is 331,000,000 roughly
1% of the population is 331,000,000 * 1/100 = 3,310,000
So that means that 3 million people own 33% of 14 trillion in property alone. These numbers are really hard to imagine.
1 trillion has 12 zeros behind it
so 14 trillion has 12 zeros behind it.
3 million people own 1,400.000,000 = 14 000 000 000 000 dollars worth of property.
That means that each person in that group of 3 million is 1 of 14 , 000, 000 in wealth just in property alone. The goods will dilute this somewhat, but I think you get the idea.
3 million people in the United States are multimillionaires, if they own 100% of the property. Of course that isn't true, but I think it's fair to say that they are not poor either.
According to Peter G. Keen, a benefit of a decision support system is that it helps in making better decisions.
A decision support system simply means a computerized program that is used for supporting judgments in an organization. It's used for decision-making.
According to Peter G. Keen, a decision support system is also vital as it helps in increasing communication and saves costs. It also aids new insights and learning.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25592766
Answer:
A. No, because Ahmed is not a merchant.
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability is a law in contract which states that when there is a transaction between a seller (the merchant), and a buyer, there is an unwritten guarantee from the seller, that the product meets up to the ordinary standards of care. This means that the goods must be fit to do what the merchant says it will do. Therefore, if the seller finds it defective, he could return it to the seller. and if the seller refuses to make a change, a legal case could be established. The merchant by law is a wholesaler or retailer, who sells goods in which he has expertise or special skills.
Ahmed in the question could be argued in court to not be a merchant of cars and as such, has no expertise with which he can make a guarantee for the car being sold to Carlos.