Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: Pure comparative fault.
Explanation:
To begin with, Comparative Negligence is an approach of the Contributory Negligence that is adopted nowadays by most of the states and that focuses in the amount of fault of each party when it comes to determines who's negligence was the one that caused the injuries. Moreover, this type of approach has two other more different approaches, that are pure comparative and modified comparative.
To continue,<em> ''</em><u><em>pure comparative negligence''</em></u> allows parties to collect for damages even when they are more than 50 percent responsible for the injury, however the amount of damages is limited by the party's actual degree of fault. Meanwhile the modifed comparative negligence only recognizes the recover of the damages when they are less than the 50 percent responsible of the injury. That is why if the state that hears the case follows the doctrine of the pure comparative negligence then the plaintiff will be able to recover the 40 percent of the injuries by the negligent defendant, even thought if he was 60 percent responsible.
<span>Both of these examples are illustrative of the "behavior" element of the assertive message format. These example are objective in that they only outlined what happened in a given situation. Although the second may appear to have an emotional connotation, it simply gives an objective impression of what happened.</span>
Answer:
Students believe that if the initiative does not happen, the funds for the initiative will not be spent elsewhere.
Explanation:
The visual appearance is both non rival and non excludable I.e. Pure public good
Benefit is 17*490=8.330
Benefit is greater than cost so college administrators should undertake the beautification initiative
Solution :
Total labor variance = [(standard rate x standard hours) - (actual rate x actual hours)]
= [$11 x (1300 x 2)] - ($9.90 x 2340)
= $28600 - $23166
= $ 5434 unfavorable
Labor price variance = ( standard rate - actual rate) x actual hours
= ($11.00 - $9.90) x 2340
= $ 1.1 x 2340
= $2574 favorable
Labor quantity variance = standard x (standard hours - actual hours)
= $11.00 x [(1300 x 2) - 2340]
= $11.00 x (2600 - 2340)
= $11.00 x 260
= $2860 unfavorable