Answer:
<em>For Kenji he falls on the category M2, for Lucia it's M2, and for Eric belongs to the category of both M1 and M2 respectively.</em>
Explanation:
<em>M1 money supply comprises of currency in physical form and coin, the demand deposit( check-able) travelers check</em>
<em>
M2 money supply comprises of Certificate deposit and M1, savings, money market funds, and time deposits for example, M2 money supply comprises money. that is less liquid/</em>
- <em>
Kenji has $25000 in a money market account - it belongs to the category of M2 money supply.</em>
- <em> Lucia has $8000 in a two year CD, it belongs to the category - M2 which is money supply
</em>
- <em>Eric withdrew money from the bank to do laundry. The money he took will go to cash that is available or in the economy at that time or the physical currency. these category belongs in M1. As M2 money supply contains M1 therefore this example also belongs in M2.
</em>
Answer:
satisficing
Explanation:
Satisficing is a combination of "satisfy" and "suffice" (or enough). It refers to a situation where instead of trying to reach a completely satisfying solution, you just settle for a relatively good or a so-so solution.
Personally I believe it is something that borders mediocrity, since you should either do something right or do not do it at all. It is like doing something that might work, but not completely.
Answer:
PV Index = 1.158
Explanation:
Present value index is the ratio of discounted cash flows of the project divided by initial outlay required for the project thus first we calculate the Present Values for Investment B
Present value factors @ 12% for year 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively.
1
0.893
0.797
0.712
0.636
Net Present Value = -9000 + (5000 * 0.893) + (4000 * 0.797) + (3000 * 0.712) + (1000 * 0.636)
NPV = $1425
Present value Index = NPV / Initial investment = 1425/9000 = 0.158
This can be interpreted as 1 + 0.158 = 1.158,
1 being the initial investment. You can also choose not to subtract the initial outlay when calculating NPV.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
c. The array of forces attaching people to their jobs.
Explanation:
Job embeddedness is a study of employee retention. It focuses on all the forces and factors that retain an employee on the job. The theory identifies critical elements that determine a connection between an employee and their job.
These elements are Fit, Links and Sacrifice.
Fit is how the employee perceives their own compatibility with the job. Links are the number of connections the employee has in the working community. Sacrifice is the loss of potential benefits, in monetary terms or psychological, when the connections with the social community are broken.
Hope that helps.
Answer and Explanation:
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Cost savings:
Companies usually offshore manufacturing or services to developing countries where wages are low, thus resulting in cost savings. These savings are passed on to the customers, shareholders and managers of these companies.
2. Skills:
The competitive advantage of nations often means that some countries or regions develop a much better ecosystem for certain types of industries. This means there is better availability of skilled human resources in that region for specific types of tasks. For example, India and the Philippines have a large pool of English-speaking, college educated youth; as well as a mature training infrastructure; that makes it ideal for business process outsourcing. Therefore, many companies choose to offshore certain business functions (e.g. call centers for customer support) to these locations.
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Quality Control:
While companies can set quality standards for work performed by foreign employees, language and cultural barriers, as well as overseas supply chains, can present barriers to quality control. Products made overseas can be flawed because of out-of-date or worn equipment in overseas factories, or substandard raw materials. In 2000, for example, Masterlock had to recall more than 750,000 locks made in China. Worn dies at the Chinese factory produced locks that could be pulled apart without a key.
2. Public Image:
In times of high unemployment in the United States, sending jobs out of the country can hurt a company’s public image. Fewer regulations in other countries can make it less expensive for American factories to operate, but environmental damage and labor abuses that make the news can tarnish the image of companies involved there. Consumers have organized boycotts against companies that use child labor or sweatshops to produce clothing and shoes. In response, companies such as Nike, Dell and Gap have established codes of conduct for their suppliers.
