Answer:
The fair value of the assets of the identifiable assets of Thompson company are $38 million and the fair value of identifiable liabilities is $6 million. So if we were to find the value of Thompson company just on the basis of identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities we would subtract the identifiable liabilities from the identifiable assets.
38-6= $32 million.
This means that on the basis of Identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities the value of Thompson company is $32 million but they Anderson Company $ 30 million for the company which means that the company has a negative goodwill. The negative good will is the price paid - the fair value.
30 million - 32 million = -2 million
This means that Anderson Company will record -2 million as negative goodwill and this implies a bargain purchase which means Anderson company will record this 2 million as a gain on their income statement.
Explanation:
Answer:
The company's net operating income for May is $7,930
Explanation:
Sales revenue = $97,000
Variable costs
= $97,000 × (1 - 70%)
= $97,000 × 0.69
= $66,930
Fixed costs = $38,000
Therefore, net operating income = Sales - revenue - variable cost - fixed cost
= $97,000 - $66,930 - $38,000
= $7,930
Answer:
<u>FALSE</u>
Explanation:
Note that, recruitment sources are the channels or sources from which qualified applicants for a position in a company are gotten. One such channel or source is through employees in the organisation who knows a qualified person outside the organisation to take up open positions.
Therefore, the Referrals are those that apply because they were prompted or referred by employees in the organisation to apply for vacancy.
Answer:
24%
Explanation:
For the taxes due on April 2020 (current year taxes):
The Lin household falls under the fourth tax bracket for married individuals filing jointly:
- tax rate 24%
- Income between $171,051 to $326,600
If no deductions were available, they would owe $188,000 x 24% = $45,120 in taxes.
Answer:
Ball can certainly hold Sullivan to a contract for sale of the land. Sullivan in his reply to Ball's enquiry offered to sell the forty-acre tract of land at $60,000 and nothing less. Ball accepted this offer by Sullivan by stating his acceptance.
These exchanges of offer and acceptance meet the terms of a valid contract. Therefore, Ball can always hold Sullivan for contract enforcement.
Explanation:
In making a valid contract, offer and acceptance are key ingredients, with specific consideration. Since the two parties, Ball and Sullivan are agreed on the consideration and have exchanged offer and acceptance, the validity of the contract is enhanced thereupon.
