Answer:
The cash balance on November 30 amounts to $155,700
Explanation:
Cash balance on November 30 = Beginning balance + Collection of cash from October sales + Collection of cash from November sales - Payments for October Purchases - Payments for November Purchases
where
Beginning balance is $13,700
Collection of cash from October sales = October Sales × % amount collected
= $240,000 × 70%
= $168,000
Collection of cash from November sales = November Sales × % amount collected
= $240,000 × 1.20 × 25%
= $72,000
Payments for October Purchases = October Purchases × % amount paid
= $70,000 × 65%
= $45,500
Payments for November Purchases = November Purchases × % amount paid
= $150,000 × 35%
= $52,500
Putting the values in the above formula
Cash balance on November 30 = $13,700 + $168,000 + $72,000 - $45,500 - $52,500
= $155,700
Answer:
C. both liquid and a store of value.
Explanation:
Treasury Bonds are fixed interest long term government debt instrument issued by the government through the monetary authorities (Federal Reserve or Central Bank) to raise fund from the public. Treasury bond has a maturity of between 10 and 30 years.
Treasury bonds is one of the most liquid financial instrument in the world as it can be turned to cash within a day.
The T-Bond, as treasury bonds is often called is a good store of value as it pays interest and the principal is backed by a legal contract.
Answer:
Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.
Explanation:
Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.
When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.
As George is the employee, he is bound to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.
If the new hires had not been adequately trained to make use of the system. This is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
<h3>What is fundamental attribution bias?</h3>
Fundamental attribution bias can be defined as the way in which a person judge another person without considering the situation factors.
Based on the giveing scenario Paulina is using fundamental attribution bias on the new employ by ignoring the reason why the new hire did not use the company's expert software system.
Therefore this is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
Learn more about fundamental attribution bias here:brainly.com/question/17109470
Answer:
A larger industrial and service sector, and a larger number of people working outside of agriculture, can indicate a higher level of industrialization in the economy and vice versa. This means that the size of industrial service and the sector of agriculture employment rate indicates the level of industrialization because if the agriculture employment is higher than the industrial service it means that the country is not fully developed yet and therefore the level of industrialization is lower. But if the industrial service is higher than the agriculture employment that suggests or indicates that the country is developing or developed. For example in the United States the size of the industrial/service sector is much larger than it's agricultural employment and therefore this should suggest that country is much more industrialized or developed and the United States is. In comparison you take a developing country such as Chad and you can see that the agricultural employment is higher than the size of the industrial/service sector and in relation to this you can see that Chad must have a lower level of industrialization and in fact it does.
Explanation:
