Answer: The answer is Yes. This is because you have a choice to accept or decline.
Answer:
No close substitutes for the product exist and there is one seller.
Explanation:
Answer:
the total compensation cost is $75,000
Explanation:
The computation of the total compensation cost for this plan is shown below:
Total compensation cost = option granted × fair value of each option
total compensation cost = 75000 × $1
total compensation cost = $75,000
Here to determined the total compensation cost we simply multiplied the option granted with the fair value of each option so that the correct amount could come
Therefore the total compensation cost is $75,000
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
