All categories

3 years ago

How do I solve 6/2 + 8/3

Mathematics

1 answer:

Xelga [282]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The solved given fractional expression is $\frac{17}{3}$

Therefore the given fractional expression becomes

$\frac{6}{2}+\frac{8}{3}=\frac{17}{3}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given fractional expression is $\frac{6}{2}+\frac{8}{3}$

To solve the given fractional expression as below :

$\frac{6}{2}+\frac{8}{3}$

$=3+\frac{8}{3}$

$=\frac{3\times 3+8}{3}$

( here taking the term 3 as LCM )

$=\frac{9+8}{3}$ ( by adding the sums here )

$=\frac{17}{3}$

$\frac{6}{2}+\frac{8}{3}=\frac{17}{3}$

Therefore the solved given fractional expression is $\frac{17}{3}$

Therefore the given fractional expression becomes

$\frac{6}{2}+\frac{8}{3}=\frac{17}{3}$

The solved given fractional expression is $\frac{6}{2}+\frac{8}{3}=\frac{17}{3}$

You might be interested in

A 46 gram sample of a substance that is used to sterilize surgical instruments has a k-value of 0.1374. Find the substance's hal

mars1129 [50]

Answer:

$t=5.0days$

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the formula for the exponential decay that is $N=N_{0}e^{-kt}$ , we have N= $\frac{1}{2}{\times}46=23$ , $N_{0}=46$ and k=0.1374.

Thus, $N=N_{0}e^{-kt}$ becomes

$23=46{\times}e^{-0.1374t}$

$\frac{23}{46}=e^{-0.1374t}$

$\frac{1}{2}=e^{-0.1374t}$

Taking log on both sides, we get

$ln(\frac{1}{2})={-0.1374t}$

$t=\frac{ln\frac{1}{2}}{-0.1}$

$t=\frac{-0.6931}{-0.1374}$

$t=5.0days$

4 0

3 years ago

The graph shows the time and distance Mr. Patel has driven while on a business trip. What is the unit rate in miles per hour he

boyakko [2]

Answer:75. y/x = 75/1 = 75

Step-by-step explanation:

y/x = 75/1 = 75

7 0

3 years ago

Lucy Baker is analyzing demographic characteristics of two television programs, American Idol (population 1) and 60 Minutes (pop

creativ13 [48]

Answer:

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_1 -\mu_2 \neq 0$

Or in the alternative way would be:

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_1 \neq \mu_2$

Step-by-step explanation:

A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".

The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".

The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".

On this case the claim that they want to test is: "The means for the two groups (American Idol and 60 Minutes) is the same". So we want to check if we have significant differences between the two means, so this needs to be on the alternative hypothesis and on the null hypothesis we need to have the complement of the alternative hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: $\mu_1 -\mu_2 = 0$