Answer:
umm what did u mean by that
Explanation:
A. They wanted to continue to trade with Asia but the Ottomans cut off their overland spice routes
Explanation:
- The fall of Constantinople had far-reaching consequences, since the Ottomans had finally established themselves in the Balkans and could no longer prevent them in their march to Europe, which would only end under Vienna in 1683.
- A large number of Byzantine scholars, after the fall of Constantinople and its collapse, will escape to Western Europe and contribute to the emergence of humanism and the Renaissance in European culture.
- Because of all this, the fall of Constantinople is often considered the event that marked the end of the Middle Ages. In the final fighting during the siege, the last Byzantine emperor, Constantine also lost his life.
Learn more on Constantinople on
brainly.com/question/13802846
brainly.com/question/1234343
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The end of the Peloponnesian War did not bring the promised “…beginning of freedom for all of Greece.”[1] Instead, Sparta provoked a series of wars which rearranged the system of alliances which had helped them win the long war against Athens. A peace conference between Sparta and Thebes in 371 ended badly and the Spartans promptly marched upon Thebes with an army of nine thousand hoplites and one thousand cavalry. Opposing them were six thousand Theban and allied hoplites and one thousand cavalry.[2]
Over generations, the Thebans had been increasing the depth of their phalanx, generally given pride of place on the right wing of coalition armies, from the traditional eight men, to sixteen, then twenty-five and even thirty-five ranks. As the Spartan and Theban armies maneuvered toward the plain of Leuctra, the brilliant Theban general Epaminondas devised a new tactic which would use the deep phalanx to destroy the myth of Spartan superiority.
Over the generations, the citizens of Thebes had developed a reputation as tough, unyielding fighters. Epaminondas had witnessed the power of the deep Theban phalanx at previous battles, and increased the depth of the phalanx to fifty ranks, but only eighty files wide. But Epaminondas’ true innovation was to position the deep Theban column not on the right, where it would have clashed with the Spartan’s weaker allies, but on the left, where it would attack the main phalanx of the Spartan “Peers” led by King Cleombrotus, arranged only twelve ranks deep. In other words, Epaminondas was concentrating his fighting power at the critical point in the evenly-spaced, less concentrated Spartan phalanx. Finally, he arranged the Theban’s allies on his right would advance “in echelon”, each poleis’ phalanx staying slightly to the rear of that to its left, so that the allied right would protect the Theban’s flank, but not initially engage with the enemy (see Leuctra map – ‘Initial Situation’). When asked why he positioned the Theban phalanx opposite the Spartan king, Epaminondas stated he would “crush…the head of the serpent”.[3]
The middle east is the answer
Answer:
the possible answer should be freedom
