All categories

3 years ago

Belinda keeps a record of her expenses for the week as shown:

Business

1 answer:

Mademuasel [1]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

d. $38.00

Explanation:

The computation of the overall Belinda expense for the week is shown below:

= Bus fare expense + lunch out expense + hair cut expense + movie rental expense

= $8.70 + $7.35 + $16 + $5.95

= $38

We have added all the types of expenses that are provided in the case i.e. bus fare, lunch out, hair cut and movie rental expenses.

You might be interested in

A marketing consultant uses the job costing system and has a pre-determined overhead rate of $15 per direct labor hour. This amo

monitta

Answer:

D. $590

Explanation:

Predetermined overhead rate = $15 per labour hour

Direct Material cost = $50

Labor rate = $75 per hour

Number of Direct labor hour = 6

Direct labor cost = 6 x 75 = $450

Overhead applied cost = Predetermined overhead rate x Direct labor hours

Overhead applied cost = 15 x 6 = $90

Total cost = $50 + $450 + $90

Total cost = $590

So, the correct answer is D. $590

7 0

3 years ago

Anne is a full-time student at UCLA buts works part-time as a waitress at a diner near her dormitory. She earns an hourly wage b

miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

In California, if the tip is included in the service charge, Anne's employer must pay taxes for them. The employer is required to pay for these taxes in California, not the employee. Even though tips are not part of an employee's wage, they are still taxable. This means that Anne must include the $51 in her AGI.

5 0

3 years ago

Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents. Six small citie

MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

The percentage of variation esplained by the model is given by the determination coefficient, on this case:

$R^2 = 0.934^2 =0.872$

And we have 87.2% of the variation explained by the linear model given.

$\hat y = 5.756(8.5) -36.895=12.031$

And we have 12.031 doctors per 10000 residents.

Explanation:

Assuming the following dataset:

x y

8.6 9.6

9.3 18.5

10.1 20.9

8.0 10.2

8.3 11.4

8.7 13.1

Assuming this question: "The data has a correlation coefficient of r = 0.934. Calculate the regression line for this data. What percentage ofvariation is explained by the regression line? Predict the number of doctors per 10,000 residents in a town with a per capita income of $8500."

We want a linear model like this:

$y = mx +b$

Where m represent the slope and b the intercept for the linear model. And we cna find the slope and b with the following formulas:

$m = \frac{n \sum xy - \sum x \sum y}{n \sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2}$

$b = \frac{\sum y}{n} -m \frac{\sum x}{n}$

And from the dataset we have the following values:

$n= 6, \sum x =53, \sum y = 83.7 , \sum xy = 755.89, \sum x^2 = 471.04$

And replacing into the equation for m we got:

$m =\frac{6(755.89) - (53)(83.7)}{6(471.04) -(53)^2}=5.756$

And the intercept:

$b = \frac{83.7}{6}-36.895 5.756 \frac{53}{6}=-36.895$

And then the linear model is given by:

$\hat y = 5.756 x -36.895$

We can find the estimation replacing x = 8.5 into the linear model and we got:

$\hat y = 5.756(8.5) -36.895=12.031$

And we have 12.031 doctors per 10000 residents.

The percentage of variation esplained by the model is given by the determination coefficient, on this case:

$R^2 = 0.934^2 =0.872$

And we have 87.2% of the variation explained by the linear model given.

4 0

3 years ago

Prime Corporation's building was destroyed by a tornado. The fair market value of the building at the time of the tornado was $4

Sergio [31]

Answer:

D) $150,000

Explanation:

Insurance proceeds that are not reinvested in replacing damaged property are taxed. Apparently Prime corporation didn't reinvest into replacing the property, so this transaction should be taxed as a property sale. Prime received $400,000 for the building with a $350,000 basis which results in a net gain = $50,000.

The other $100,000 were given as replacement income and therefore should be taxed as such.

So the total taxable amount = $50,000 + $100,000 = $150,000

4 0

3 years ago

Liz trespasses on mega corporation's property. through the use of reasonable force, mega's security guard ned detains liz until

irina1246 [14]

Mega is likely liable for trespassing. It is because when an individual trespass on someone else’s property without the owner’s consent, the individual who had trespass would likely be liable or detained for trespassing on someone else’s property and can be charged based on the law.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers