Pancho Villa has been characterized as a great leader in the troops he led during the Mexican Revolution, for this reason he is perceived as one of the people with great attitudes and skills to be a great leader, an issue that was noticeable when seeing how people he was involved and participated in different acts always supporting this character in his fight. The leadership that Francisco Villa exercised was sometimes participatory, first communicating the problems to them, then expressing their proposals, discussing what they could or had to do at the end of the day to make a decision, which almost always depended on him and choosing the indicated and precise option.
He executed an autocratic leadership since he assumed in various issues all the responsibility of making decisions, he said how they would address the opponents when they would start and when the fighting would end, motivated them with words of encouragement for them and their families especially by protecting their interests, their honor and their integrity.
Another of the leaderships executed by Pancho was the democratic one since the intervention he had in the people regarding the improvement of his conditions and the struggle he faced from enemies in order to free Mexicans from slavery. He was a leader always focused on his group, he directed his guerrillas without hesitation and with all the determination, he did not need to gather people to support him, people would be with him in order to be part of their squads, since they motivated their proposals and vision towards liberation from slavery and the improvement of the people and their families in every way, people had it in a concept of a smart person.
I believe back in the day this was, and still is, a form of "stumping." I may be wrong, but presidents such as Lincoln would go town to town no matter the size, stand on a tree stump, and give a speech to the people.
Answer: was held on 26 April 1920 at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, between the astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis. It concerned the nature of so-called spiral nebulae and the size of the universe; Shapley believed that distant nebulae were relatively small and lay within the outskirts of Earth's home galaxy, while Curtis held that they were in fact independent galaxies, implying that they were exceedingly large and distant.
The two scientists first presented independent technical papers about "The Scale of the Universe" during the day and then took part in a joint discussion that evening. Much of the lore of the Great Debate grew out of two papers published by Shapley and by Curtis in the May 1921 issue of the Bulletin of the National Research Council. The published papers each included counter arguments to the position advocated by the other scientist at the 1920 meeting.
In the aftermath of the public debate, scientists have been able to verify individual pieces of evidence from both astronomers, but on the main point of the existence of other galaxies, Curtis has been proven correct.
e mentions that as much as Queen Elizabeth would have liked to ... play, and to depict her and Henry V as “the celebrity couple of everyone's.
Answer:
The U.S. Constitution is the nation's fundamental law
Explanation:
The U.S. Constitution is the nation's fundamental law. It codifies the core values of the people. ... They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental." The American democratic system is not always based upon simple majority rule.
