What economic effect did mercantilism have on England? -

History

1 answer:

zheka24 [161]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

It increased England's wealth

Explanation:

Mercantilism had a huge economic impact on England by increasing the wealth of the country.

Mercantilism allowed for England to exploit the natural resources in the colonies, as well as their dependence on the mother country.

In this process, England gained massive profits by only allowing the colonies to trade with them. So, they had a monopoly on that trade.

So, the correct answer is that it increased England's wealth.

You might be interested in

Which of the following systems believes that the role of the government is only to promote competition and provide public goods?

Schach [20]

Answer: Capitalism

Explanation: The capitalist system is based on private property and complete freedom in the choice of a type of business. Everyone has the guaranteed right to participate in the free market with his supply of goods and services, where the government should provide an environment and conditions in which everyone has equal rights. In this way, the government provides competitiveness, and in addition it also provides public goods within its public services and competencies. All other decisions on the amount of capital invested, the means of production, resources, are made by individuals or companies that own capital, and participate in the market in accordance with the law of the market itself.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

miss Akunina [59]

<span>The first Diner's Club cards, McDonalds's, Disneyland, and an explosion of TV stations began to expand in the country. Billy Graham, Oral Roberts, and Fulton Sheen used TV to sell products and preach religion.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Prior to the constitutional convention, what two models of intergovernmental relations predominated throughout the world?

N76 [4]

Governments typically had been either unitary or confederated. Or another way to say that is that they either focused on centralized power (in someone like a king) or particularized power -- the power in the parts of a kingdom rather than at the center.

So, for instance, in France (prior to its Revolution), all the power in the kingdom centered in the hands of the king. For 175 years, they didn't even have a meeting of the Estates General which was their version of a representative body. And the power of nobles on their lands was reduced while the king's power grew.

Meanwhile, in the German territories, there was a loose confederation called the Holy Roman Empire. One of the kings or princes held the title of "emperor," but he really had no imperial power. The confederated German states retained control over their own kingdoms or territories.

The American experiment mixed something of the best of both approaches. There would be strong central power in the federal government, but putting checks and balances on that power by retaining certain aspects of control in the hands of the states within the union.

3 0

3 years ago

Prince Vladimir of Kiev most likely converted his people to Eastern Orthodox Christianity because:

FromTheMoon [43]

Vladimir converted his people to Eastern Orthodox Christianity because the choice cemented ties with Byzantium.

<h3>What is the Orthodox Christianity?</h3>

This religion believed their form of Christianity is correct while the teachings of Catholicism and Protestantism are wrong

He rejected the Roman Catholicism in order to avoid the papal influence that came with the religion.

Hence, he converted his people to Eastern Orthodox Christianity because the choice cemented ties with Byzantium.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.