Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Nominal GDP:
= (No. of burgers sold × Selling price of each) + (No. of fries sold × Selling price of each)
= (4000 × 3) + (6000 × 1.5)
= 12,000 + 9,000
= $21,000
Real GDP (in 2008 prices)
= (No. of burgers sold × Selling price of each) + (No. of fries sold × Selling price of each)
= (4,000 × $2.50) + (6000 × $2)
= 10,000 + 12,000
= $22,000
GDP deflator:
= (Nominal GDP ÷ Real GDP) × 100
= (21000 ÷ 22000) × 100
= 95.45
After losing all of this distribution, one option for it might have been a form of nonstore retailing that uses machines to offer goods for sale. This is an example of automatic vending.
Right here are the styles of retailing that exist these days – save retailing: This includes different forms of retail stores like branch shops, specialty shops, supermarkets, comfort shops, catalog showrooms, drug shops, superstores, discount stores, excessive cost stores, and so forth.
The retailing concept is an idea that examines the evolution of and transformation of the retail lifestyles cycle. This concept was first introduced by using Professor McNair from Harvard College. The retailing idea indicates new retailers will generally begin with low-value and occasional-margin operations.
Retail is the sale of products and services to purchasers, in comparison to wholesaling, that is sales to business or institutional clients. A store purchases goods in massive quantities from manufacturers, without delay or via a wholesaler, after which sells in smaller quantities to purchasers for a profit.
Learn more about retailing here brainly.com/question/17613245
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps
A purchase agreement is a legally binding contract that states the terms and conditions of purchasing a good/making a sale. This agreement is legally binding for both the purchaser and the seller. The agreement is contingent on being paid back at the date agreed and receiving the items that were intended to be paid for.
The answer is option B. The main challenge of career planning in changing times is that you need to revise your plans often.
The world we live in is dynamic. New inventions, new technology, new methods of doing things always come up with time.
Because of this, when making a career plan, one must be fully aware that the process is not static. That is, changes would occur and as such, you have to revise your plans often so that it is in line with what is obtainable at the time.
<em>Read more on career planning here: brainly.com/question/6457203?referrer=searchResults</em>
