How did the Battle of Midway change the war in the Pacific?

History

2 answers:

ycow [4]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

American forces began attacking Japanese bases.

Explanation:

Len [333]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Among the options shown here:

American forces began attacking Japanese bases.

Explanation:

The Battle of Midway, fought between June 3-6, 1942, broke the power and sensibly damaged the operational capacity of the Japanese Navy. All the four Japanese aircraft carriers were destroyed by American pilots. The carriers have been the most strategic warships in modern naval warfare since WWII.

The Japanese command attempted to gain naval and air superiority in the Pacific by delivering a blow to American air force and Navy in Midway. However, their plans were soured and instead, Japan´s Imperial Navy suffered a crushing defeat: it lost 3,000 men, 300 airplanes and over 200 hundred of its best pilots, a heavy cruiser and its four carriers. The American losses were inferior, including a carrier. Japan lost its ability to expand in the Pacific and since then it fought the war on the defensive.

You might be interested in

Which advancement allowed computers to become more than simple data

prohojiy [21]

C. The microprocessor

4 0

3 years ago

Can someone let me know if this is correct? And if not what is wrong

olchik [2.2K]

Answer: That all sounds correct. That is kinda what the U.S. is like today. The U.S. used to be like that back in the late 1800's though.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Social Darwinists in the late 1800s and early 1900s used the philosophy of “Survival of the Fittest” to justify which national a

sergiy2304 [10]

Laissez-Faire I think?

8 0

3 years ago

Select all the correct answers.

11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

A. They cared for the sick and worked for social justice.

D. They founded schools that focused on Catholic teachings.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Why is Israel believed to have nuclear weapons why isn’t it confirmed? Where’s the evidence they do?

leonid [27]

For one, they’re not a part of any treaty that prohibits the building of nuclear weapons.

A treaty of such magnitude exists, called the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Basically, the treaty says that nations can gain the technology and training for the use of nuclear technology from those that use nuclear technologies in exchange for using them for peaceful purposes. In other words, anyone that is a part of this treaty is allowed to build nuclear power plants to supply power for their country, not to build nukes.

Last time I checked, Israel is one of four countries that is not a part of this treaty. So, even if Israel did have nuclear weapons (technically, as I’ll explain later, no one can say for sure, but for all practical purposes, it does), it’s not as though they violated any rules, technically.

5 0

3 years ago