Answer: It allowed the United States to strongly influence foreign governments without treaties or military intervention.
Explanation: Diplomacy is essentially forming international relations, so doing such may be seen as imperialist as a nation may do this to grow their power and influence
<em><u>Thomas Jefferson opposed Hamilton's bank as he believed that it was unconstitutional and he was of the idea that such an institution wasn't going to benefit an agrarian system. </u></em>
Further Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton who had wealthy ties because of his marriage, was the one who was at the leading end of the Federalists. The Federalists were synonymous with representing the seaports' interests. The Anti-federalists whose leader was Thomas Jefferson identified with the interests of the Southerners and rural population.
Both of them identified with different goals and interests and hence were at the opposing ends.Hamilton wanted a central government that was strong and worked towards the expansion and improvement of commerce as well as industries; an efficient and a more organized life was introduced because of him. Also, a decentralized system of economy was introduced. He understood the integrity of the consolidated position of the government in foreign affairsaffairs but was reluctant to the idea of giving powers in other fields. Hamilton entertained the belief that the idea of national Bank is totally constitutional, Jefferson thought otherwise.
Learn more:
1. Those who favored American imperial expansion in the late 19th and early 20th century believed it would?
brainly.com/question/9095336
2. How did the freedom train suggest the meaning of freedom remained controversial? brainly.com/question/1277347
Answer details:
Grade: High school
Chapter: Hamilton vs Jefferson
Subject: History
Keywords: Alexander, Hamilton, marriage, Federalists, Thomas Jefferson, rural, population, economy, central government.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. It has limited jurisdiction to decide on a case. It has the right to preside over specific cases. It is also an appeals court for cases involving the constitutional law. The Supreme court can hold a limited review on cases referred up from a lower court. Some of the original cases the supreme court can hear are a crime that takes place under a violation of federal law, international trade disputes, disputes where the United States is involved, and disputes where the individuals involved live in different states.
During the 19th century, the House of Commons moved away from the monarchy and became independent since it became in itself a check on the monarchical rule.
