<u>Answer:</u>
Now and then depicted as a false analogy or a faulty analogy, the week analogy presents a defense by depending too vigorously on superfluous similitudes without recognizing that <em>two ideas, things, or circumstances might be very particular from each other in an increasingly applicable manner. </em>
False Dilemma is a fallacy <em>dependent on an either-or sort of contention.</em>
Two decisions are exhibited, when more may exist, and the case is made that one is false and one is valid or one is worthy and the other isn't. <em>A False analogy is an informal fallacy.</em>
A person who lists being a valued older adult as a gratification of grandparenthood especially values "<span>being perceived as a wise, helpful person."
As grandparents we have vital representative and reasonable capacities in our societies. We are imperative just for what we mean as the most established living agents of our families. Our parts as family history specialists, coaches, and good examples can give status and regard on us.
</span>
This is an opinion question, so here is what I would answer with:
The government should not place special taxes on fast food as it is how some people survive. People with low income cannot simply run to the grocery store and get everything to make a burger and fries. They must rely on large fast food chains to give them healthy, enough, food for survival.
OR...
The government should place special taxes on fast food. This would increase the prices on foods sold. This said pricing could detour the public to making healthier, cheaper food choices.
Depends on what the court has to say freedom for equality or slaves well depends on how you plan your day
