Between 1500 and 1700, there was continuous political instability in the African continent as a whole and in West Africa in particular.
This is because the 'Age of Exploration' of European countries had turned into an age of colonization where several major European power sought to control important resources all over the world.
Fueled by greed and power, these European countries were able to colonize the whole of Americas and then turned their eyes on the East.
West Africa served as an amazing area with abundant natural resources, timber, gold, diamond and most importantly people.
The Europeans eventually developed a sinister slave trade between West Africa ans the new World.
Millions of people were subjected to slavery and shipped to the new world, as European colonizers sought to topple local governments and control resources.
For 200 years, West Africa was in political and economic turmoil
Answer:
Voting is a process which gives an individual citizen the rights to choose their leader or candidate to rule their country.
Explanation:
Voting for a presidential candidate from a minor party can be beneficial and disadvantageous. By voting candidate from a minor party, people are rejecting bigger parties like Democrat and Republican. By choosing a minor party or called as the third party in America, your appeals and request heard clearly. Minor parties have ideologies of both Old and New Right to make America prosper.
Drawbacks are that it is hard for the minor party to get ballot access laws for its candidacies. Because they are in small size and not like the other two dominated party in America, they face many problems.
Answer:
These example sentences are selected automatically from various online news sources to reflect current usage of the word 'relevant.' Views expressed
Explanation:
I helped you answer this one
Answer:
Hello!!! Princess Sakura here ^^
Explanation:
New York & Philadelphia
(Try to summarize this)
We can immediately think of different features: styles in art, architecture and music; different writing scripts; a distinct literature; a particular set of religious beliefs; noteworthy forms of government; special practices – for example, gladiators (Rome), caste (India) and so on. And of course, all civilizations occur at a particular time and place in world history.
For example, you will all know which civilization I am talking about when I mention pyramids, mummies, hieroglyphs and pharaohs. Ancient Egypt, of course.
Nothing I’ve said above, however, is quite as it seems. Taking Ancient Egypt as an example, the Egyptians only built pyramids at one phase of their history. Hieroglyphs were not used in everyday life. Sometimes the land of Ancient Egypt was ruled by foreigners, not native pharaohs. Their religious beliefs changed over time. And yes, they certainly embalmed bodies – but so did many other ancient peoples.
Other civilizations changed much more drastically. The ancient Romans began their history under the rule of kings, before changing to a republic, and then an empire. They spent much of their history as pagans, but later converted to Christianity. In their early days they built Greek-style temples; by the end they were building great domed cathedrals. They even ended up in an entirely different location: starting out in central Italy, the last people who considered themselves “Romans” died defending a city in what is today Turkey.
All civilizations show these sorts of changes, to a lesser or greater extent, and yet, most of us know what is meant when we hear the phrase “Ancient Egyptian civilization” or “Ancient Roman civilization”.
Of course, as historians (professional and amateur), we expect all civilizations to change over time: they grow and spread, their cultures evolve, their political systems change. But what is really interesting (for me, at any rate) is, when one civilization changes into another.
This issue lies behind such questions as: when did the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia come to an end? What exactly happened to the civilizations of ancient Greece and Rome? Can the civilization of China be truly regarded as a single, long-enduring civilization, or do the outward continuities mask one or more break-points?
How does a civilization, which over the course of centuries or millennia has been gradually changing, change so drastically that it can no longer be regarded as the same civilization?
In a series of blog posts I’m going to look at this matter with regard to particular civilizations.
