Answer:
Bandwagon
Explanation:
We've all heard Dr. Singer's case against killing animals for food. But let's face it; this is America and everyone loves a good steak. If you're invited to dinner and the host is serving meat, you're going appear outright rude if you refuse to eat what you're served. The fallacy involved here is Bandwagon
From the first row of the table, at a price of $10, suppliers are not willing to make any shoes (quantity supplied of shoes = 0) since they will not make significant profit off of it.
In contrast, the demand is 500, since everyone would love to buy shoes at that very cheap price.
Answer:
Crusading in northern and eastern Europe led to the expansion of kingdoms like Denmark and Sweden, as well as the creation of brand-new political units, for example in Prussia. As areas around the Baltic Sea were taken by the crusaders, traders and settlers—mostly German—moved in and profited economically.
Explanation:
i hope that helps
If you assume that Marcus must have been in a good mood because he helped Juanita pick up some books she dropped, according to attribution theory, his attribution is internal and unstable.
An internal attribution occurs when someone assigns some personal reason to justify an external event, rather than regarding the event as an environmental attribution.
- Like for example the belief that Marcus was in a good mood because of an external event.
The attribution is also unstable in that it assumes that a behavior is due to a temporary and unstable factor, meaning Marcus' good mood can change over time.
Therefore, the attribution given to Marcus is internal and unstable.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/15838795
