Answer:
Polonius reads the love letter aloud to Gertrude and Claudius for two reasons:
He wants to show that he is a loyal subject, and that he's not trying to get his daughter together with Hamlet—Hamlet, being a royal, won't get much advantage from marrying the daughter of a mere noble. If he reveals the message to them directly, they'll know he is "a man faithful and honorable," as Claudius says.
He wants to get credit for being the one to know why Hamlet is mad. Once he reads the letter, he uses it to explain how Hamlet became mad: "he, repelled...Fell into a sadness, then into a fast...and, by declension / Into the madness wherein now he raves." Claudius was very eager to find out why Hamlet was mad, so being able to give an explanation makes Polonius look good.
His plans after reading the letter are to show the king directly that love is the cause of Hamlet's madness by taking the king to observe a conversation between Ophelia and Hamlet. As it turns out, Hamlet is very mean to Ophelia during this conversation, and the King concludes that he is not in love: "Love? His affections do not that way tend." So Polonius's plan doesn't really succeed.
Answer:
Helllooooo
Explanation:
How's your dayyy im good how about youu ?
The author’s purpose is always going to be telling the reader to do, say something, or have an idea.
The Latin poet Lucretius In on the nature of things, argues that one does not need to fear death because everything is made of atoms, including the human soul.
Full name of Lucretius is <u>Titus Lucretius Carus</u>. He is one of the oldest philosophers and poets of Rome. One of his famous works is <u>"De rerum natura"</u> which translates into "In On the nature of things".
This phenomenon explains the <em>Epicurus </em>of all the physical things that have survived. He firmly believed that religion makes a person believe in things that do not exist. He was against religion and gave a didactic explanation of it.
Learn more about In on the nature of things here: brainly.com/question/28482539
The answer is true, horses were treated better than slaves during that time.
