Answer:
the pic isn't clear take a clearer one
The executive branch carries out and enforces laws. It includes the president, vice president, the Cabinet, executive departments, independent agencies, and other boards, commissions, and committees. American citizens have the right to vote for the president and vice president through free, confidential ballots.
The country that has the highest casualty rate in relation to the total forces is Austria-Hungary. Thus, the second option is correct.
<h3>What is casualty rate?</h3>
The casualty rate refers to the rate of the accidents and incidents that took place in the given period of time. It is the calculation of the number of people injured in the specific period.
According to the chart, Total casualty that took place in Austria and Hungary is 7,020,000 with the total forces of 7,800,888.
Therefore, it can be concluded that Austria-Hungary is the nation with the greatest casualty rate relative to the total number of troops. Hence, the second option is correct.
Learn more about casualty rate here:
brainly.com/question/3201643
#SPJ1
Answer:
In Katz v. USA (1967), the most important Fourth Amendment case, the defendant was sentenced by a federal court for illegal gambling. He organized them using a long-distance telephone, which was the crime against federal law. The judge admitted evidence to the trial in the form of telephone recordings of the accused received by the FBI agents. They installed eavesdropping equipment outside the telephone booth with which the accused called while committing a crime. The Supreme Court rejected the conviction.
Despite the fact that in the Katz case, the Court emphasized the protection of a person’s private life, rather than premises, it made one reservation: “The Fourth Amendment should not be construed as a basis for the adoption of a common “right to privacy.”
The decision in the Katz case is of great importance also for another reason. Judge Harlan, who joined the majority opinion, defined the criteria subsequently used by the courts to establish a violation or non-violation of the Fourth Amendment as a result of specific actions by the authorities. This criterion is called “reasonable expectation of privacy.” The criterion is based on two premises: first, a person must show a valid (subjective) expectation of respect for the right to privacy; secondly, this expectation must be of such a kind that society can recognize it as "reasonable."
Explanation:
