The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare and Contrast the words of the song to the views of U.S. Government officials of the late 1800s and early 1900s and with the text of the Dawes Act.
Ok, first we have to say the m¿name of the song that is going to be compared. It is "Don't Drink that Water," performed by David Mattews Band.
Part of the lyrics says the following<em>."What were you expecting? Not room for both. Jus room for me....Yes, I will call this home...You have been banished..."</em>
This song can be compared to the Dawes Act in that this act broke up the Native tribes to support the "Americanization" of the Native Indians and the settling of the white Americans in their territories.
It was Massachusetts legislator Henry Dawes who supported the Dawes Act in 1887, a piece of legislation known as the General Allotment Act.
Answer:
well i would say the childrens age maybe 12? and aids uhh maybe 3? and thats all sorry i do not know the rest please report
Explanation:
Answer:
:))))))))))))))))))))))))
Answer:
they controlled colonies' government but gave colonies economic control. allowed colonies to run their government but held economic control.
Answer:
They left many workers in debt to their employers.
Explanation:
The mill villages were something that was found very remarkable during the 19th century industrial development in the area known as the Blackstone River Valley. The very first textile mill was successfully built in 1793 by Samuel Slater and he later employed over thirty staff and they were mostly children.
Company villages were built by mill owners who wanted to use that as a philanthropic means to earn the loyalty of their workers. The company established stores and other small businesses like Barber shops. These businesses were easily assessed by workers living in those villages but that also made the millhands to remain in debt to their employers.
