Answer:
The Caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate chamber, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts, in retaliation for a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he fiercely criticized slaveholders, including a relative of Brooks. The beating nearly killed Sumner and it contributed significantly to the country's polarization over the issue of slavery. It has been considered symbolic of the "breakdown of reasoned discourse"[1] and the use of violence that eventually led to the Civil War.
Explanation:
Social media can at times Weaken our inhibitions or internal censors, emboldening us to write things or post images.
Our contacts with others on social media frequently result in "weak bonds," meaning that we don't feel as personally connected to them as we do when we speak to them in person. Consequently, even while we communicate more, we may not necessarily be strengthening our relationships as much.
When we connect via social media, we frequently trust the individuals receiving our messages, which results in generally more honest conversation. Second, we tend not to deepen our relationships—they tend to remain in the status quo—because social media does not strengthen our social ties as much as face-to-face interaction does. Finally, we don't receive the same variety of ideas as we once did because we frequently contact and follow people who share our opinions.
Learn more about censors https://brainly.in/question/6357532
#SPJ4
Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the Northern and Southern regions of the United States struggled to find a mutually acceptable solution to the slavery issue. Unfortunately, little common ground could be found. The cotton-oriented economy of the American South continued to rest on the shoulders of its slaves, even as Northern calls for the abolition of slavery grew louder. At the same time, the industrialization of the North continued. During the 1820s and 1830s, the different needs of the two regions' economies further strained relations between the North and the South.
The first half of the nineteenth century was also a period of great expansion for the United States. In 1803, the nation purchased the vast Louisiana Territory from France, and in the late 1840s it wrestled Texas and five hundred thousand square miles of land in western North America from Mexico. But in both of these cases, the addition of new land deepened the bitterness between the North and the South. As each new state and territory was admitted into the Union, the two sides engaged in furious arguments over whether slavery would be permitted within its borders. Urged on by the growing abolitionist movement, Northerners became determined to halt the spread of slavery. Southern slaveholders fiercely resisted, however, because they knew that they would be unable to stop antislavery legislation in the U.S. Congress if some of the new states were not admitted as slave states. In order to preserve the Union, the two sides agreed to a series of compromis
Answer:
Your answer would be...B. the equality of all citizens
Explanation:
The teaching of Japan to treat other with equality
