3 years ago

Which of the following statements offers the most relevant evidence to support this argument?

English

2 answers:

ziro4ka [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

This is the statement that offers the most relevant evidence to support the argument that background noise interferes with short-term memory when students read prose. Option C states that students who read in silence scored better on a particular test than those who read with background noise. Therefore, the implication is that the students were affected by the noise, which meant they could not concentrate on the test properly.

Alex Ar [27]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

You might be interested in

J j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j

serious [3.7K]

Answer:

jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the function of the noun clause in this sentence?

lianna [129]

I'd say it's D) Indirect object, but I'm not sure, so don't take my word as gospel :)

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Headlines are sometimes misleading because it is impossible to tell the whole truth in only a few words.

cricket20 [7]

The answer is True.
Because headlines are only using few words, is possible for a misleading. Headlines are only texts to indicate the whole article. The headline’s only purpose is to quickly and briefly draw the attention to the whole story or article.

3 0

3 years ago

Can l go to the party (to, too ,two)<br>

mel-nik [20]

Answer:

Too

Explanation:

That's the word that best fits the sentence

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Plz help<br> look the photo