Answer:
Market value
Explanation:
The market value of a product is the price at which a buyer is willing to purchase a good irrespective of prevalent price of a commodity. It is that amount a buyer and seller are willing to strike a deal for given normal market conditions.
In this scenario John originally bought his five years ago for $300,000. Its current value is $350,000. His real estate agent notified him that a buyer just made an offer on his home for $365,000.
Despite the house now being $350,000, $365,000 is the market price at which the buyer and seller are willing to settle.
Answer:
A) Roasters delivers the goods to Speedy
Explanation:
Risk of loss under the law of contracts is used to determine which party should bear the burden of risk for damage occurring to goods after the sale has been completed, but before delivery has occurred. This is normally used after the contract is formed but before buyer receives goods, something bad happens.
- The breaching rule applies risk of loss on the seller if at the time of delivery, the goods show up broken.
- Risk of loss shifts from seller to buyer at the time that seller completes its delivery obligations
- For a destination contract, then risk of loss is on the seller
- For a delivery contract, then risk of loss is on the seller
- if the seller is a merchant, then the risk of loss shifts to the buyer upon buyer's "receipt" of the goods. If the buyer never takes possession, then the seller still has the risk of loss
Answer:
Journal entry to record accrued wages on December 31, 202x
Dr Wages expense 1,260
Cr wages payable 1,260
Journal entry to record wages expense on Friday, January 2
Dr Wages expense 840
Cr wages payable 840
Journal entry to record payment of wages on Monday, January 5
Dr Wages payable 2,100
Cr Cash 2,100
It would be $125,000 + $10,000=$135,000 the insurance company would need to pay
Answer:
Product Implied Warranty
According to the Uniform Commercial Code, a product warranty guarantees that a product will work when used for its intended purposes. There are two key types of implied warranties: merchantability and fitness. The implied warranty of merchantability states that a product will meet reasonable expectations of the buyer. The implied warranty of fitness means that the product will meet the buyer's intended use.
Based on the above, we can conclude that the implied warranty of merchantability actually exists for the hair dryer. However, Patrick clearly violated it in this situation through the accident of dropping it in water.
Having thus violated the warranty, he cannot reasonably recover any damages from the company.
Explanation:
a) Facts of the case:
1. Every hair dryer is properly labeled and contains safety precautions against misuse.
2. The SF9000 hair dryer that Patrick purchased functioned properly for a month.
3. Patrick accidentally drops the hair dryer in water, causing him an electric shock.
4. Patrick sues for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability.
