Answer:
Price variance = $330 Favorable
Usage variance = $90 Unfavorable
Explanation:
Formula approach
<em>Material price variance</em>
$(0.045-0.042)× 110,000 = $330 Favorable
Material Usage Variance
(110,000)-(0.45×240,000) × 0.045 = $90 unfavorable
Columnar Approach
Price variance $
Standard cost (0.045 × 110,000 ) = 4950
Actual cost (0.042 × 110,000 ) = <u>4620</u>
Variance 330 Favorable
Usage Variance
Ounce
Standard quantity (0.45×240,000) = 108000
Actual quantity <u>110,000</u>
Variance in ounce 2000 unfavourable
× Standard price <u>0.045 </u>
Variance <u> $90 Unfavorable</u>
Answer:
When the government has a strong say in what businesses do, two things may happen:
- businesses can become corrupt and inefficient,
- or the businesses can develop closer cooperation between them and the government that helps them become more efficient.
The later applies to Japan, but also to countries like Chile. Chilean government has signed free trade agreements with virtually every single country in the world, granting Chilean companies huge international markets.
While in the US, even now with President Trump, the government has a relatively small influence in the private sector (except for defense contractors). I believe American corporations have a larger influence on the government, than the influence the government has on them.
The question is incomplete:
Beau works for a small pest-control company that has a total of five employees. From his point of view, the primary disadvantage of a small business is the:
-complicated management structure.
-risk of failure.
-limited ability to raise capital.
-personal relationship with his employer.
-limited potential for him to advance
Answer:
Limited ability to raise capital.
Explanation:
The answer is that from his point of view, the primary disadvantage of a small business is the limited ability to raise capital because small businesses tend to have few resources and a small participation in the market and these affect their ability to get capital and their growth potential.
The other options are not right because as small businesses have few employees, they have simple structures, the risk of failure can be high or low as in a bigger company and a personal relationship with his employer is not a disadvantage. Also, a small business can offer opportunities to advance.
Answer:
Choose CareCo.
Explanation:
Given : CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees. ApathyInc pays slightly higher wages than CareCo, but does not offer health insurance.
A person who is unhealthy & expects to have high healthcare expenses : would have issues having direct health insurance from an insurer, based on high risk evaluation. Even if by chance, he/ she gets, it will be at extremely high price i.e premium rates & is likely to have less coverage. So, the person rationally would prefer to protect himself / herself from this huge health expenditure risk, & would protect self & family from catastrophic health costs. He / she would do so by choosing to work for Care Co, which gives generous health insurance to all its employees, by sacrifising higher salary by Apathy giving no health insurance. He/ she is logical as the wage differential is likely to be less than catastrophic health costs
Answer:
$123,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Selling cost of the condominium = $150,000
Minimum down-payment required = 18%
Interest rate on mortgage = 9.5%
Now,
Cost of mortgage
= Selling cost of the condominium - Minimum down-payment required
or
= $150,000 - ( 18% of $150,000 )
or
= $150,000 - $27,000
or
= $123,000
