Answer: Interestingly enough, there has always been a Wilsonian strain in American foreign policy, an idealistic belief in self-determination, and in some ways it was suppressed during the Cold War ”1 Thus, contrary to President Wilson’s ideas and the public opinion of the early 1900s, war still exists and will continue to exist. However, the objectives, or at least the public’s perceptions of American foreign policy, have taken on a new role. Americans have typically been idealists. Idealism has been present in the American mindset from its founding days and to an extent in American foreign policy; however, under President Wilson’s leadership, idealism took on an expanded role in American foreign policy.
Woodrow Wilson said on the eve of his inauguration “that his primary interests were in domestic reform and that it would be ‘the irony of fate’ if he should be compelled to concentrate on foreign affairs.”2 Fate would have it that President Wilson would lead the United States through the greatest war the world had ever seen. Although Wilson had limited leadership experience in foreign affairs in 1914 when war broke out in Europe, he knew how things should take place.
Explanation:
i looked it up:)
he made them believe it occurs naturally, not magically.
Answer:
i think it was admitted as a slave state
Explanation:
Answer:
almost 20 years ago (used extinguished 70) until in the end, change after change, this has meant a change in the channel of the rivers. Already in the middle of last year the news of the increase in the number of grizzly bears in the park came out, due to an increase in bushes and fruits, which feed the bears, caused by a decrease in elk. This effect is due to the phenomenon known as waterfall or trophic network. A trophic cascade is the succession of elements that serve as food for others in an ecosystem. Let's see it in a simple way: there are producers who contribute organic matter (such as vegetables and some microorganisms), primary consumers (who feed on producers; they are herbivores), secondary consumers (who feed on primary ones) and tertiary consumers or super-predators (who feed on the secondary ones, or on any other link in the food chain). There are also decomposers, which are fungi.
Explanation:
In the case of Yellowstone, the wolf is a super predator and its absence led to an excess increase in the lower links, such as that of the elk. The moose wiped out the vegetation and this meant that the number of many animals that live in or feed on trees and shrubs, such as the bear, disappeared or decreased. In turn, as the number of prey decreased, the number of birds of prey and scavengers also fell. Currently, the presence of the wolf has restored all the balances: the number of moose has decreased and the vegetation has increased, bears, small mammals, birds of prey and scavengers, other scavengers such as foxes or weasels ... being the only victim. the coyote. That which is said that "nature is wise" is a truth like a temple. Ecosystems know how to regulate themselves without needing to receive extra “help”. In other words, the excuse of the hunters that they kill to regulate the life of the mountains is nothing more than that, an excuse to kill. Here we should take good note of this and stop the wolf slaughter that is taking place in Asturias and Castilla y León (we tell you here). The Yellowstone case is an example that could not be more clear. And, so that you have no doubts about the process that occurred, I leave you the Sustainable Man video, with subtitles in Spanish. A video that has no waste, not a single one of the 4 minutes it lasts.
