<u>Answer:
</u>
The headline is an example of the conflict caused by states administering elections while federal law protects voting rights.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Different states have different requirements for the voters to be eligible for voting, but the federal laws unequivocally grant voting rights to everyone above eighteen years of age.
- The conduct and operations of elections are in the hands of the executive, but they do not have the right to modify the rules set for the conduct of elections by the United States Constitution.
- This disparity gives rise to conflict between the state machineries and federal laws.
By <span>directing their attention to another task.</span>
Answer:
Click at the above pic and the ans will appear.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality basically the "separate but equal" but it wasent really equal
Explanation:
Answer: Read the sentence.
Jefferson also wanted to obtain the Port of New Orleans at the mouth of the Mississippi River so farmers could transport their goods.
Which option best paraphrases this sentence?
In the text, the president wanted "the Port of New Orleans at the mouth of the Mississippi River so farmers could transport their goods."
Jefferson also wanted to obtain the Port of New Orleans at the mouth of the Mississippi River so farmers could transport their goods.
The Mississippi River and the Port of New Orleans were very important for people to be able to travel in the U.S.
The president wished for farmers to float their products down the Mississippi River to the Port of New Orleans.
Explanation: An apple, potato, and onion all taste the same if you eat them with your nose plugged