The inference shows that the Miranda rule prevents innocent people from being found guilty.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
An inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information that's given in a literary work.
In this case, the inference shows that the Miranda rule prevents innocent people from being found guilty since suspects are advised to keep their silence.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
Answer: Texas
Texas lay between Spanish Mexico and French Louisiana where it was considered as the most highly prized regions of North America because it was greatly wanted by both France and England.
Moreover, France was given a claim to Texas by the explorations of René Robert Cavelier and control the southeastern part of Texas. In addition, both countries are powerful that they knew that their claims to Texas would continue to be challenged until they permanently occupied or colonized the area.
They had the support of the church, the military was loyal , they had a strong claim.
They might have failed at waging war properly. (Napoleon in Russia 1812) They couldn't deal with the revolts (French revolution), they might have brought an economic downfall to their country.
They might have expanded lot. (The roman empire was the largest under emperor Trajan)
they let people build great buildings. They commissioned musicians to perform masterpieces
Answer:
your answer is B, because that ws the start of the Allied forces beating back the Axis powers.
Explanation:
No.
Intentionally killing innocent civilians is unjustifiable.
