1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ollegr [7]
3 years ago
11

In the early 1800s, the federal government wanted American Indians who did not assimilate to

History
1 answer:
Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.

Andrew Jackson, from Tennessee, was a forceful proponent of Indian removal. In 1814 he commanded the U.S. military forces that defeated a faction of the Creek nation. In their defeat, the Creeks lost 22 million acres of land in southern Georgia and central Alabama. The U.S. acquired more land in 1818 when, spurred in part by the motivation to punish the Seminoles for their practice of harboring fugitive slaves, Jackson's troops invaded Spanish Florida.

From 1814 to 1824, Jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of eleven treaties which divested the southern tribes of their eastern lands in exchange for lands in the west. The tribes agreed to the treaties for strategic reasons. They wanted to appease the government in the hopes of retaining some of their land, and they wanted to protect themselves from white harassment. As a result of the treaties, the United States gained control over three-quarters of Alabama and Florida, as well as parts of Georgia, Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky and North Carolina. This was a period of voluntary Indian migration, however, and only a small number of Creeks, Cherokee and Choctaws actually moved to the new lands.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Would Rousseau’s system work? Why or why not?
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

The Social Contract

Explanation:

Would Rousseau’s system work? Why or why not?

4 0
2 years ago
Why might african americans find solidarity with the jewish community
Mazyrski [523]
Both groups have a very deep history of racial persecution that they and their ancestors went though
Hope this Helps
8 0
3 years ago
What was the first country to move social contract theory from theory to practice?
denpristay [2]

Answer:

The answer is "Greek"

Explanation:

Social contract theory, almost as old as philosophy itself, is the view that people's good or potentially political commitments are needy upon an agreement or arrangement among them to shape the general public in which they live. Socrates use something very like an Social contract theory to disclose to Crito why he should stay in jail and acknowledge capital punishment. Nonetheless, Social contract theory is properly connected with current good and political hypothesis and is given its first full work and guard by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the most popular defenders of this gigantically persuasive hypothesis, which has been one of the most predominant speculations inside good and political hypothesis since the commencement of the cutting edge West. In the 20th century, good and political hypothesis recaptured philosophical force because of John Rawls' Kantian rendition of implicit understanding hypothesis, and was trailed by new examinations of the subject by David Gauthier and others.

All the more as of late, thinkers from alternate points of view have offered new reactions of implicit understanding hypothesis. Specifically, women's activists and race-cognizant thinkers have contended that Social contract theory is in any event an inadequate image of our good and political lives, and may truth be told disguise a portion of the manners by which the agreement is itself parasitical upon the oppression of classes of people.

4 0
3 years ago
Based on what you have learned, what court should
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

federal district court on edge

8 0
3 years ago
Conpare “old” vs. “new” immigrants including the motives (push/pull factors) by which immigrants came to the United States
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

The main difference is which part of Europe they came from, and the numbers of immigrants. There were many, many more "New Immigrants'" than old, 20 million people between 1880 - 1920. And the New Immigrants came mostly from southern and Eastern Europe, which meant they were almost all Catholics.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jefferson and Madison opposed Hamilton’s economic plan because they believed the federal government should use only those powers
    11·2 answers
  • What was the most important factor in the early formation of villages and cities?a.nice weatherc.ability to hunt     b.ability t
    13·2 answers
  • What happened after annabeth and the manticore went over the cliff side?
    14·2 answers
  • if you are about to be hit from behind your best course of action is to break gently and stop the car
    6·1 answer
  • How did canon law differ from governmental law?
    14·2 answers
  • Which type of historical text typically is a collection of articles or essays with a common theme?
    8·1 answer
  • an example of primary source is a(n) : answer choices A.)diary B.)biography C.)history book D.) internet web site​
    10·2 answers
  • (WILL GIVE BRAINLYEST) BEING CORRECT IS BETTER THAN BEING FASTER
    6·1 answer
  • When was the moon landing
    7·2 answers
  • What university did Thomas Jefferson study at?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!