Answer:
I personally think the Senate should be elected and that it is to stay that way. Government would be too powerful since the source of it's power is The People. If the people cannot directly vote and just have to watch as they're chosen in front of them, they might have to overthrow the "tyranny".
Explanation:
"Voters have elected their senators in the privacy of the voting booth since 1913. The framers of the Constitution, however, did not intend senators to be elected in this way and included in Article I, section 3, "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote." The election of delegates to the Constitutional Convention established the precedent for state selection. The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their tie with the national government, which would increase the chances for ratifying the Constitution. They also expected that senators elected by state legislatures would be able to concentrate on the business at hand without pressure from the populace," as it says in senate.gov.
This means that Senate is usually elected. They should stay it that way- it's as if changing an amendment, which would be a long and stressful process. Which means it will never happen. The People are the source of the government's power and they should stay as it otherwise the US' gov't may be seen as too powerful.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.
Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.
What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.
Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.
That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Answer:
Foreign policy
Explanation:
because foreign policy is when a government puts it's interest in the world politics
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The state laws argued for "separate but equal schooling". It was found that the separate schools (for Blacks and Whites) were very far from equal, meaning that some of the US Citizens were denied the same liberties others got solely for their skin color.
Yessssssssssss because things are horrible now days
