1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dlinn [17]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following was true of the Supreme Court’s rulings concerning Progressive legislation?

History
2 answers:
anzhelika [568]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C) The court often sided with business by declaring laws unconstitutional.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court was reliably looked with essential inquiries concerning government obstruction in what has been a generally unregulated Laissez-Faire style capitalistic economy and battles to discover precisely what role it should play.

gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
7 0
The option that was true of the Supreme Court’s rulings concerning Progressive legislation would be that "<span>C) The court often sided with business by declaring laws unconstitutional," since there was a heavy progressive pushback during this time. </span>
You might be interested in
What were supreme courts views on corporation rights in late 1880s
Tomtit [17]

Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has at least some of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] In the United States and most countries, corporations have a right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. In a U.S. historical context, the phrase 'Corporate Personhood' refers to the ongoing legal debate over the extent to which rights traditionally associated with natural persons should also be afforded to corporations. A headnote issued by the Court Reporter in the 1886 Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. claimed to state the sense of the Court regarding the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations, without the Court having actually made a decision or issued a written opinion on that point. This was the first time that the Supreme Court was reported to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause granted constitutional protections to corporations as well as to natural persons, although numerous other cases, since Dartmouth College v. Woodward in 1819, had recognized that corporations were entitled to some of the protections of the Constitution. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), the Court found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 exempted Hobby Lobby from aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because those aspects placed a substantial burden on the closely held company's owners' exercise of free religion.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood


5 0
3 years ago
Who represents clocis in the state house and senate
Katen [24]

Answer: Members first elected to the State Legislature on or after the passage of Proposition 28 in November of 2012 may serve 12 years in either the Assembly or Senate, or a combined length of service in both the Assembly and Senate, so long as the combined terms do not exceed 12 years of service. Members elected to the State Legislature prior to the passage of Proposition 28 may serve a maximum of three two-year terms in the Assembly and two four-year terms in the Senate as established by the passage of Proposition 140, in November of 1990. Such a legislature, composed of two houses, is called 'bicameral,' while a legislature with only one house is known as 'unicameral.' California employs the bicameral system.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What restrictions did Spain place on American Trade
alexdok [17]
They closed the Mississippi River to all American commerce in 1784. This made it difficult for American farmers to get their goods to international markets. Spain would eventually allow Americans to use the river, but placed a tariff for the privilege. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP
klio [65]
1. You could contact The U.S. Army or Navy. We normaly jump into most conflicts anyway.hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Why was salt so valuable for people living in Sub-Saharan Africa? (i need 3 reasons please)​
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

because salted meat could last a long time

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 50 POINTS!!! PLS HELP!!! How has Jamestown made an impact on Colonial America?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement about greek civilization is an opinion rather than a fact
    9·1 answer
  • What happened after the colonies were established?
    7·1 answer
  • What did the Battles of Antietam and Gettysburg have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • Why does Sen. Hammond believe slaves exist in the North as well as the South? Who are these "slaves"?
    13·1 answer
  • One of the most important resources of tenochtitlan was
    15·1 answer
  • John Winthrop and his followers settled in Massachusetts.
    6·2 answers
  • should the similar countries of Asia form a union similar to the European union so they have a better chance to compete in the g
    10·1 answer
  • As railroads grew:
    5·1 answer
  • What was the National Assembly's response to possible foreign invaders?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!