1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
14

Other than the U.S. Supreme Court, all federal courts were established by __________. A. the Constitution B. Congress C. preside

ntial executive order D. the states
History
2 answers:
lukranit [14]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is option B.

<u>B. Congress.</u>

The United States Congress is the bicameral legislature of the United States of America's federal government. It consists of two houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives, with members chosen through direct election.

Brrunno [24]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B. Congress.

Indeed, this question is quite tricky since the most accurate answer would be, all federal courts were established by Congress, <u>as authorized by article III of the Constitution</u>, which mandates the creation of a Supreme Court and gives permission to Congress to create lower federal courts and determine their jurisdiction.

You might be interested in
Which phrase best defines laissez-faire?
zalisa [80]

B.) to leave alone and let be

Laissez-faire refers to a free market economic policy where the government has no control over the economy. It is a French term which means to "let it be".

Capitalism in its pure form is a laissez-faire economic system. During the late 19th century, the US practiced laissez-faire capitalism. The government had no regulations on the economic system and employers were allowed to run their businesses as they wished. In a free system like this there are opportunities to become very wealthy but workers are often exploited.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
Vladimir [108]
<h3>The answer would be; B!</h3><h3 /><h3>-Kanksi</h3>
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reasons against getting rid of the Electoral college
VARVARA [1.3K]

Here's an excerpt from https://www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005330

Pro 1 : The Founding Fathers enshrined the Electoral College in the Constitution b/c they thought it was the best method to choose the president. Using electors instead of the popular vote was intended to safeguard against uninformed/uneducated voters by putting the final decision in the hands of electors most likely to have the info. necessary to make the best decision; to stop states w/ larger pops. from having undue influence; & to compromise between electing the president by popular vote & letting Congress choose. According to Alexander Hamilton, the Electoral College is if "not perfect, it's at least excellent," b/c it ensured "that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who isn't in an eminent degree endowed w/ the requisite qualifications." The Founders wanted to balance the will of the ppl against the risk of "tyranny of the majority," in which the voices of the masses can drown out minority interests.

Con 1 : The reasons for which they created the Electoral College are no longer relevant. Modern technology allows voters to get info. to make informed decisions in a way that couldn't have been foreseen by them. Also, while Alexander Hamilton in 1788 saw the electors as being "free from any sinister bias," members of the Electoral College are now selected by the parties & expected to vote along party lines regardless of their own opinions about candidates. Just as several voting laws that limited direct democracy in the Constitution have been modified/discarded thru-out history, so should the Electoral College. As a result of Constitutional amendments, women & former slaves were given the right to vote, & Senators, once appointed by state legislatures, are now elected by popular vote. The vice presidency was once awarded to the runner up in electoral votes, but was changed over time to reflect the reality of elections.

Pro 2 : The Electoral College ensures that all parts of the country are involved in selecting the POTUS. If the election depended solely on the popular vote, then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions. To win, candidates need electoral votes from multiple regions & therefore they build campaign platforms w/ a national focus, meaning that the winner will actually be serving the needs of the entire country. W/o the electoral college, groups such as IA farmers & OH factory workers would be ignored in favor of pandering to metropolitan areas w/ higher pop. densities, leaving rural areas & small towns marginalized.  

Con 2 : The Electoral College gives too much power to "swing states" & lets the presidential election to be decided by a handful of states. The 2 main parties can count on winning the electoral votes in certain states, such as CA for the Dem. Party & IN for the Rep. Party, w/o worrying about the actual popular vote totals. B/c of the Electoral College, presidential candidates only need to look to a limited # of states that can swing 1 way or the other. A Nov. 6, 2016 episode of PBS NewsHour revealed that "Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton have made more than 90% of their campaign stops in just 11 so-called battleground states. Of those visits, nearly 2/3 took place in the 4 battlegrounds w/ the most electoral votes — FL, PA, OH, & NC."

Pro 3 : The Electoral College guarantees certainty to the outcome of the election. If the election were based on popular vote, it would be possible for a candidate to receive the highest # of popular votes w/o actually obtaining a majority. This happened w/ President Nixon in 1968 & President Clinton in 1992, when both men won the most electoral votes while receiving just 43% of the popular vote. The existence of the Electoral College precluded calls for recounts or demands for run-off elections. The electoral process can also create a larger mandate to give the president more credibility; for example, President Obama received 51.3% of the popular vote in 2012 but 61.7% of the electoral votes. In 227 years, the winner of the popular vote has lost the electoral vote only 5 times. This proves the system is working.  

Con 3 : The Electoral College ignores the will of the people. There are over 300 million people in the US, but just 538 people decide who'll be president. In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by more than 1 million votes, yet still lost the election on electoral votes. Even President Donald Trump, who benefitted from the system, stated after the election that he believes presidents should be chosen by popular vote: "I would rather see it where you went w/ simple votes. You know, you get 100 million votes & somebody else gets 90 million votes & you win." Just as in 2000 when George W. Bush received fewer nationwide popular votes than Al Gore, Donald Trump will serve as the POTUS despite being supported by fewer Americans than his opponent.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the definition of a simple sentence?
ICE Princess25 [194]

The correct answer is B. A simple sentence expresses one complete thought; it's composed of an independent clause that follows the subject-verb pattern.

Explanation

A simple sentence is a syntactic unit that expresses a complete idea, which means it is an idependent clause. The sentence has a basic structure that is composed of a subject, verb (action), and complement. Simple sentences are independent clauses because their meaning does not depend on any complement that contextualizes them. An example of a simple sentence is "I play in the park with my friends". In this sentence the subject is "I", the verb is "game" and the complement is "in the park with my friends". According to the above, the correct answer is B.

3 0
2 years ago
The turning point in Greek history was the _____.
Wittaler [7]
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The turning point in Greek history was the Alexander Period. <span>Alexander the Great served as king of Macedonia from 336 to 323 B.C. During his time of leadership, he united Greece, reestablished the Corinthian League and conquered the Persian Empire.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During world war i, germany used a "big bertha" cannon to hurl shells into paris 30 miles away. this gun also had a long barrel.
    5·1 answer
  • The impact of lyndon johnson
    11·1 answer
  • Place the characteristics and goals of each country into the correct category.
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE GIVE ME AN ACTUAL ANSWER
    7·1 answer
  • Who wrote the publication common sense encouraging the colonist to rebel against Great Britain
    12·1 answer
  • How was the us economy linked to the broader global economy during the cold war?
    11·1 answer
  • A nation that was not an allied power of ww1 was?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP IN ONE MINUTE
    6·2 answers
  • Gusto ko magkaroon ng _____ upang ako at _____<br><br>E.S.P​
    6·1 answer
  • What is a physical change?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!